The Mesh Report – Clueless: Obama Thought He Won Debate Until Told Otherwise

Clueless: Obama Thought He Won Debate Until Told Otherwise

Daily Witness October 11, 2012 649

According to an article in the Daily Mail UK, President Obama walked off the stage after his underwhelming debate performance convinced he was the winner. Against the intuitive grain of 60 million viewers and a breathlessly fawning press who winced through a painfully dismal showing, Obama was content that he had delivered the rhetorical goods. He only realized he sank like a Chevy Volt dropped in water after his senior aides broke the news to the surprised, and disturbingly oblivious, Commander in Chief. Apparently, the most transparent President in history in also the least self-aware.

Senior aides had been wrought with anxiety for weeks that Obama wouldn’t fare well since he stubbornly refused to rigorously prepare: “’President Obama made it clear he wanted to be doing anything else – anything – but debate prep. He kept breaking off whenever he got the opportunity and never really focused on the event.” While campaigning in Nevada, Obama even poked fun at his own reluctance to hunker down: “ It’s a drag. They’re making me do my homework.”

Some aides anonymously revealed that Obama’s disdain for Romney runs so deep he considered preparation for the contest, and Romney as well, beneath him. His dripping contempt was palpable on the stage, as he refused to make sustained eye-contact with Romney, looking down at his shoes as if they were outfitted with a teleprompter.

In fact, the President spent much of the debate rambling through vapid talking points like he was lost in a fugue-state, tongue tied and generally torpid. It was obvious that he did not adequately prepare but now we know it wasn’t because of a demanding schedule (the day before the debate he visited the Hoover Dam instead of practicing, much to his advisors’ chagrin). He shirked what would seem like a top priority duty because he couldn’t muster even the duplicitous feint of respect for an opposing viewpoint, disgusted that someone has the audacity to challenge his ex officio proclamations.

But we learned even more than that, or at least had our growing suspicions about Obama dispositively confirmed. Despite all the contentless folderol about the virtue and wonder of bipartisan cooperation he spouted during his first campaign for president, Obama loathes dissent and only begrudgingly and condescendingly tolerates being contradicted. His brand of strident confidence crosses a line into elitist hubris, shorn of every follicle of humility, convinced that all who disagree with him are benighted fools or evil adversaries.

In other words, there is something at the heart of Obama’s animating ethos that abhors democracy, which necessarily gives free reign to a spirited exchange of competing ideas. His famous thin-skinned hypersensitivity is a symptom of a lack of self-reflection–criticism shocks him like personal offense since it never really occurs to him that he might be wrong.

And given our persistent economic doldrums, our embassies across the world on fire, Iran’s inexorable march towards a nuclear bomb, the increasingly bombastic assertiveness of China and Russia, and an unemployment rate that could only be lowered on his watch by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are good reasons for him to reconsider his convictions. But alas, he marches on into blissful oblivion, convinced he’s winning the war of ideas effortlessly, assured his floundering is perceived by the world as triumph.

This raises, even shouts out, the question: what other issues only appear to him through the filter of happy self-deceit? Does Obama really believe our enemies in the Middle East are so charmed by his swagger that they would never coordinate at attack on our embassies? Is he convinced we are grateful he has kept us unburdened by the crushing demands of regular employment? Is he under the impression Americans are thrilled they have skyrocketing health care costs, byzantine bureaucracy, and increasingly limited insurance options to cheerfully distract them from the despair of disease? Who are these nameless senior aides and why aren’t they correcting him more often?

It is hard to imagine Obama will do much better in the next debate, unless better means meaner and more aggressively mendacious. His biggest vulnerability at the podium is his dour resentment for having to be there in the first place, piqued that he should have to account for his himself before the people that elected him, that he now, at least purportedly, represents. Obama will attempt to feign interest but will only manage angry indifference–debates are for disciples of democracy, not technocratic kings.

Ivan Kenneally is Editor in Chief of the Daily Witness.


  1. barnacle December 12, 2012 at 2:03 AM - Reply

    Could this article get any more overly-dramatic? “shorn of any follicle of humility”, “marches on into blissful oblivion”. It’s funny, but also kind of embarrassing for the author. What’s most ironic is that the author references Obama’s advisers frequently, but I have no doubt that if they read this article they would simply laugh at how baroque and melodramatic the language and conclusions are. It’s like watching a really bad high school production of Shakespeare. Cute, but lip-bitingly awful to watch. Seriously, this guy should write for The Onion.

  2. dgaud December 10, 2012 at 1:41 AM - Reply

    Best example of verbal diaria I have read in awhile. Damn near made me vomit, only my laughter kept it down….

  3. ThisSiteBLOWSASSHOLES December 10, 2012 at 1:32 AM - Reply

    This article is bombastic pretentious shit; whole paragraphs are dedicated to discription

  4. Sabyen91 December 9, 2012 at 1:24 AM - Reply

    Well…I guess you can always hold onto this article when you are feeling blue…

  5. Aaron December 9, 2012 at 1:16 AM - Reply

    Wow. I suddenly feel in need of a shower!

    How dirty, dumb, and slanted must the “news” become before it again reaches some acceptable level of objectivity in this country!?

    I expect this kind of sham-psychoanalytical drivel from a Fox News affiliate. Not t on a site linked off of Yahoo News and Ruetgers.

    This whole, misinformed tirade is nothing but an ignorant ad homimem attack. Obama didn’t make enough of an impression during the debate so he’s a narcissist….! Yeah, that’s it!!!!

    You know what? I saw the last half of the first debate, and I thought he won, too. He didn’t seem to emotionally charged up, but, he called the BS and refuted it. It didn’t have the pro-wrestling pitch of the second debate, but I’m glad for that. It’s a shame when attention is diverted away from the substance of a candidate’s message and onto the delivery of the message.

    Word of advice: stop with the arm-chair psychoanalysis of what you THINK is going on in a candidates mind and keep with the issues. It’s always preposterously obscene when right-wingers last a Democrat politician for lack of commitment to democratic ideals. You’ll have more luck sermonizing about big government and smothering taxes than convincing us that Karl Rove and Dick Cheney are models of transparency.

  6. Alan from Tel-Aviv December 8, 2012 at 2:41 AM - Reply

    Benjamin Natanyahou’s face to face criticism of Pres. Obama’s must really have incensed the American leader. And he’d have certainly used some politically incorrect expression to state his antipathy publicly toward the Israeli leader if he could.

  7. sara December 7, 2012 at 3:14 AM - Reply

    How should those kind and generous Americans who gave the bullying and inflexible Obama feel giving him that ‘ ‘Second Chance’ for another ‘four bad years’ as bad as the last four years, feel the pain and misery of their misdeed in Re-electing him while he jets off for three weeks to Honolulu ? At the same time the ‘Victims of Sandy’ are yelling, screaming and crying wanting to know where are they are ‘going to live’… ‘if they will even have a house in which to enjoy Christmas”…. ‘if they will even have a ‘Christmas’ at all’… when all of Obama ‘s principles and promises that he made have been violated while he splashes about in the blue waters of Hawaiii….”Where is our President” they cry. Sorry folks your fault, you chose the ‘Wrong Man’ and you have to pay for it……….

  8. Truth December 7, 2012 at 1:58 AM - Reply

    Is it possible in hindsight that he may have won the debate.

  9. Christoph Schuerch December 6, 2012 at 2:26 AM - Reply

    Cracks me up that people are currently posting comments under this article. I’m not even a Romney supporter but Obama clearly lost that first debate. What do the election results have to do with the content of this article?

  10. Wayne December 5, 2012 at 2:22 AM - Reply

    Yeah sure…. Obama’s such a clueless loser that he kicked the brilliant economic strategist Romney’s ass on election day. What is this stupid article? A dream about what it would be like in an alternate universe?

  11. musico December 5, 2012 at 1:02 AM - Reply

    ah,,,election is over…our president is named OBAMA…give it up it is OVER…when you say as an american to a FOREIGNER that he is not your president it makes you like an ass

  12. Rachael December 4, 2012 at 5:21 AM - Reply

    This article doesn’t have a clue. It seems like the author is simply anti-Obama, and therefore is attempting to pick things out of the air to go along with this view. A lack of preparation, if we accept this to be true, does not translate to abhorring democracy. That’s quite a wild leap there. Also, it never occurs to him that he might be wrong? Have you read his autobiography? Have you seen anything from Obama that you haven’t watched with a distrustful, biased eye and therefore drawn conclusions because of that? Obama may not be the greatest President of all time, and he may be struggling with some things, but to say that he abhors democracy is histrionic in the extreme.

  13. Rune H. Stiansen December 4, 2012 at 1:25 AM - Reply

    And the Elected President is – again -…………………(fill in the missing ).

  14. Karlin December 4, 2012 at 12:32 AM - Reply

    STILL being sore losers are you? Obama WON the election by losing that debate – you just don’t get it.

  15. NW Brooks December 3, 2012 at 3:22 AM - Reply

    Your article is a piece of piss!

  16. peter_principle December 3, 2012 at 2:33 AM - Reply

    Who’s clueless now, asshole?

  17. John Doe December 1, 2012 at 3:21 AM - Reply

    The author is 110% republican..what a crappy article

  18. Lance Cole November 20, 2012 at 2:09 AM - Reply

    Shouldn’t be a surprise to him…the Queen of England snobbed him BAD at the last showing he appeared with her at, too. GREAT YouTube video of her dissing him in front of a hall of VIP’s…totally hilarious…he toasts her, she won’t meet the toast, then ignores him and leads her own toast. Thrashed him like a bell hop!!!

  19. Al November 19, 2012 at 2:28 AM - Reply

    Now contrast this with conservatives who are talking about secession from the Union…and who seems like that one who can’t tolerate opposing viewpoints? The author and the comments below are all apart of a hypocritical ideology.

  20. Ant November 19, 2012 at 1:55 AM - Reply

    It sure looks to me like he won. Maybe the article should be titled:
    Clueless: Most Americans already know how to be president, so they look for something more prestigious to do with their lives.
    Just because Romney was thinking that he won, whereas Obama was content with how it went, doesn’t mean that Romney actually must have won. The goal is who the people had more confidence in. After all, it is the job where the guy could make everyone else drop their ambitions to go fight in someone else’s war.

  21. Gladiator November 19, 2012 at 1:35 AM - Reply

    Wow! Ignorance sure is bliss! We will all be swimming in Obamas debt for our lifetime; our children and grandchildren for their lifetime. Newsflash for Mr.Smartalec Canada: Thousands of Canadians come here for their healthcare, surgeries, etc. Says alot for your socialized medicine. A friend of mine went for his 5 year colonoscopy screening. He had polyps removed, so every 5 years for him. Or so he (we) thought. Even with full health insurance he was turned away thanks to Obama Care. Now its every 10 years. Sorry! BUT hey if you want, you can have your colonoscopy, Got $5,000.00? Gosh, what a deal. Thanks Barrack. People should have to take a test to vote.

  22. Arenagal November 18, 2012 at 1:51 AM - Reply

    This writer thought he wrote
    something sensible but he didn’t. The diatribe appeals to the narrow-minded
    segment of the population, the ones who lost the election.

  23. MattT November 18, 2012 at 1:13 AM - Reply

    I’ve never seen hate for anyone democrat more than Obama. Why is this?

    I think it’s because he is not white and has an odd name. He is a citizen of the US and is a Christian (however important that is).

    He isn’t a terrorist that supports Al-Queda. He isn’t planning to take over America as a dictator or else he’d have already done it. He didn’t get the nobel peace prize because he DEMANDED it, he was given it by someone else. You wouldn’t condemn someone for being given a car by someone else would you?

    At the end of the day there are two sides to politics. There are the people vs the governing body. It is the governing bodies job to make sure the people are regulated and a country is kept intact. It is the peoples job to keep society running and make the government isn’t too powerful. Party lines are just plain dumb.

    To all Republicans that state that Obama should have ‘fixed’ the economy, that would require interference from the government on a FREE MARKET ECONOMY, which Republicans are COMPLETELY against.

    If you are going to hate Obama, at least just say it straight up and admit it’s because he has a foreign sounding name and is of colour. Say what you really mean.

  24. spook77 November 17, 2012 at 1:46 AM - Reply

    This is great, this whole thread show you just why America is in the massive hole it is in. Morons like Katie who whinge and complain and refuse to try to make things go forward, instead content to argue and fight every point her opposition bring forward. That’s basically the crux of the American way, your whole political system is set up to ensure nothing gets done. Obama has a good set of morals and the right ideas to take your country forward yet he will be fought every step of the way by you people and in 4 years time you will be in the same position you are in now only the hole will be a whole lot deeper. Whether you love or hate him, he has been put in charge and you people should be doing everything possible to help the country move forward, because the alternative right now, if you be honest with yourselves is very dire….. you guys are dead broke and in an impossible amount of debt. You have enemies all over the world and you owe China the largest portion of your debt….. better start working together or you guys will be sunk and it wont be long either.

  25. derbear November 17, 2012 at 12:35 AM - Reply

    What a clueless, stupid article.

  26. Alan Hughes November 16, 2012 at 2:53 AM - Reply

    This is the dumbest bull shit I’ve ever read.

  27. AfricanObserver2391 November 14, 2012 at 5:56 AM - Reply

    Shame … I never knew Americans were so racist. But I guess I would be falling into the ignorance pit where most of the commentators are swimming. Obama was voted into office by Americans of all colour and creed so I will avoid generalising (NOT ALL AMERICANS ARE RACIST). It would appear Martin Luther King’s Dream is still a pipe dream. The red states … are they accommodating of people of colour? I have never heard or read such acidic rhetoric after Democrats lost to Republican presidents who never benefited America. I believe the world is following American politics with interest. All I can say is that the world is learning to look elsewhere for lessons on democracy, human rights etc. What is going to happen when a latino campaigns for the white house? Or let alone a native American? Noone complained when the scandinavian Arnold “Schwarzinigger” was elected governor when he cant even speak English with an Amerian accent!!

  28. cc2 November 14, 2012 at 5:02 AM - Reply

    You are an idiot

  29. SayHi2YourMom4Me November 14, 2012 at 3:25 AM - Reply

    Yeah. Kinda like how Republicans thought they were winning the election until told otherwise! The author makes up a lot of crap in this article.

  30. NoeValleyJim November 14, 2012 at 2:33 AM - Reply

    Obama won.

  31. Fawzy Halawzy November 14, 2012 at 12:54 AM - Reply

    That’s cool; he won the whole thing anyway. I don’t think he’s losing any sleep about what he thought (if true) versus what others thought about his performance in the first debate.

  32. Bob4Hope November 13, 2012 at 2:13 AM - Reply

    Nonsense. Obama did win that debate. He performed the facts flawlessly. He lost the ‘acting audition’ … Foolishly, he thought the facts actually matter to the future of the nation … The fact that Romney lied his a$$ off, yet was perceived to be the winner in the media … is an obscenity … and disgrace to our nation. Thank goodness the elections was not so rigged as to stop his election.

  33. Reason12 November 13, 2012 at 1:06 AM - Reply

    Republicans: Stop whining and get to work on the real problems that face us. If you want to insure that Obama is unsuccessful the next four years then just keep doing what you’ve been doing that last four years, acting like a monkey-wrench. But his loss will then be all our loss, unless, of course , you are very wealthy.

  34. Isobel November 12, 2012 at 2:33 AM - Reply

    Ugh, what a disgustingly-bias article.

  35. propagandabuster... November 11, 2012 at 2:04 AM - Reply

    i Guess the American people didn’t see it your way Mr Kenneally!

    The author of this piece has no business talking of Obama’s “dripping contempt”
    even as he displays that very quality for his President.

  36. Aditya Aggarwal November 10, 2012 at 2:14 PM - Reply

    I am democrat – I will tell you I was let down by Obama in the first debate. I was surprised by the lies told by Romney in that debate with such as straight face that it felt so real – even when I knew if was all not possible – Reduced deficit by tax cuts – How many times we have tried? – Under Reagan, Bushes. Every time it has created more deficits. Out of $16T deficit $10.4T are created due to that policies. and even out of $5.4T deficit under Obama majority of – 80- 65% was due to unpaid – unnecessary wars started by Bush, tax cuts and the great recession which was started by Republican -GOP policies which Romney wanted to repeat again.

    I was surprised about – his Iran stance – It was too Hawkish – to push ourselves in war – just like Bush did with Iraq.

    He had no problem spending addition $2T on defense when people have no jobs and would not like to spent on health care.

    I think we would have won House if Obama had good performance in first debate. Not only that – Obama – had the right policy and right strategy for the country but he was not able to communicate it – just like Bill Clinton was able to do it.

    e.g. Talk about 5 point plan
    1. Tax rate cut but tax revenue to be the same there by creating millions of jobs – by cutting loop holes – Man! are we stupid there are no such big loop holes to pay for the such as huge tax cuts. Majority of economist told it. But even after agreeing to find such as large loop holes – this means the effective tax rate remains the same – So how millions of jobs will be created!!!!

    2. Drill baby Drill is the future for Energy self-sufficiency – Man! oil is a limited quantity. We are going to run out of it if not today in 20 to 50 years. It takes 20-30 years to put new infrastructure for alternate energy. So we have to do more on alternate energy and it is the only viable strategy on long run. Actually, I would save the oil as much as possible in US for rainy day.

    3. We will increase $2T in defense where let citizens have no money for health insurance or spend nothing on education or spend on research or reduce deficit.

    4. Kill Obamacare – Now healthcare was in private hands till last year. US pays the highest per person in healthcare compared to developed countries and average health parameters are in some of the worst. So how is that !!!

  37. scottabc November 10, 2012 at 2:24 AM - Reply

    Silly Obama: thinking that discussing facts in a reasonable way instead of baseless fantasies can win a debate!

  38. peteywheats November 9, 2012 at 9:08 PM - Reply

    Clueless: Romney Thought He Could Win The Election.

    P.S. Hahaha

  39. John Bowan November 9, 2012 at 2:28 AM - Reply

    Yeah well Obama won the election. The debate was irrelevant to the outcome

  40. Zach Richardson November 9, 2012 at 12:37 AM - Reply

    bullshit article. learn to write without dripping uninformed bias

  41. rob November 7, 2012 at 7:08 PM - Reply

    ivan small mind speaks filth again what else is new.

  42. Theo November 7, 2012 at 3:39 AM - Reply

    Typos in the first paragraph, broad generalizations, and wild inaccuracies. This article is ridiculous. If you’d ever participated in public debate, you’d know that when you’re performing, often times you don’t see things in the same light as people watching and it takes hearing it from other people afterward to fully understand the impression you left with your audience.
    And what a stupid concept for an article. If you take issue with Obama’s presidency, let’s hear about concrete policies you disagree with, rather than wishy-washy nonsense about how Obama thought he did after a debate.
    Come on.

  43. Michael Swanson November 7, 2012 at 1:10 AM - Reply

    It’s lovely to read this at 1 a.m. on Wednesday, November 7 and know just how unpersuasive any of you Obama bashers were. Done.

  44. Martyn Wilson November 6, 2012 at 4:14 AM - Reply

    “According to an article in the Daily Mail UK…”

    By starting your article with these words, you have immediately destroyed any semblance of credibility in the arguments that follow. As any Brit will tell you, The Daily Mail is a festering mess of prejudices, lies and half-truths that no-one with half a brain takes seriously. For very good reason, it’s known as The Daily Heil and reading it is, to quote a tee-shirt I saw recently, like spending 20 minutes in a mental hospital.

  45. Yoadrian Balboa November 6, 2012 at 3:13 AM - Reply


  46. fasteddiedigzit November 6, 2012 at 2:05 AM - Reply

    God, is that DORK really that freaking CLUELESS? No wonder he’s such a DISASTER for this country. One and DONE and good riddance!

    Go Mitt, on to victory!

  47. pbsambo November 5, 2012 at 4:32 PM - Reply

    Panetta, another idiot!

  48. Ruby Tea November 5, 2012 at 4:02 AM - Reply

    Why won’t Romney show his tax returns ??? – is he should be audited…. He does not deserve tow win since he made his money by shipping jobs to China…. He is un American…

  49. aph10 November 4, 2012 at 2:36 AM - Reply

    The people posting here are clearly misguided as seems the author.

  50. James Smith November 3, 2012 at 4:36 AM - Reply

    When americans reelect him will you THEN respect the will of the people??? Of course not since you believe in democracy only if your guy wins.

  51. Bob Scofield November 3, 2012 at 12:28 AM - Reply

    “It is hard to imagine Obama will do much better in the next debate”. Yeah, how’d that go for you? Please proceed.

  52. Goodpeople November 2, 2012 at 6:07 PM - Reply

    Could the writer of this article be filled with more malicous. It is so transparently mean spirted. You are just pandeing to your base, no reasonable fair minded person reading this article buys into it. The idiot people on here commenting do so because it makes them feel better since they are so filled with hatred.

  53. cameron burgess November 2, 2012 at 12:42 PM - Reply

    this is a joke, right?

  54. jbpolitics November 2, 2012 at 12:16 PM - Reply

    Why don’t those who just don’t like Obama just admit it upfront instead of thinking of a million reasons that really don’t make sense. Just admit that you personally just don’t like him and that’s fine. That’s honest. Please just stop trying to make your emotions seem rational. A rational person begins with credible evidence first and makes decisions methodically. In the process there are no emotional outbursts belittling anyone.

  55. Bill Hart November 2, 2012 at 11:29 AM - Reply

    At the end of the day, one has to wonder who really did win, if anyone did

  56. Chu Hyon November 2, 2012 at 11:14 AM - Reply

    During the Watergate investigations, President Nixon was forced to resign or be impeached for the attempted cover-up of breaking into a hotel room to uncover the Democrats election strategy. This was sold as a constitution crisis by the left.

    Now President Obama, Hillary Clinton, Leon Panetta, and a host of the lefts most shrill talking heads, willfully try to cover up their mendacious storyline
    blaming the deaths of four Americans, on a obscure video. They refused
    ambassador Christopher Stevens numerous requests to increase security in
    Benghazi, on the anniversary of 911. An Ambassador killed, and three other fine Americans dead who by all accounts refused orders to stand down, and tried to save the ambassadors life.

    The disastrous foreign policy of this administration, and the deaths of these four Americans, should bring immediate calls for impeachment and several high level resignations.

  57. selencious November 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM - Reply

    Obviously the writer is a repulblican and is clueless. Obama obvioulsy won the debate with facts. Romney was all about lies with no fact; always beating around the bush. Romney is a camoflage and would be the worst case for U.S if elected. Hopefully people are wise to see through him. Obama is way better and I hope he wins the election.

  58. mrivera1119 November 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM - Reply

    President Obama won on substance. If being supper aggressive and pleased with your arrogant self is counted as winning, we are more illiterate that previously thought. Mitt is a con man.

  59. Ivana Kankoneely November 2, 2012 at 9:14 AM - Reply

    The writer is a dufus

    • Matt A. November 2, 2012 at 10:48 AM - Reply

      An explanation as to why would be good. As would a helpful critique rather than a vapid statement.

  60. Matthew Dell November 2, 2012 at 9:06 AM - Reply

    No, Bush was clueless, Bush ran the US into the ground… oh whatever would you do without your beloved aristocratic demagogues… and after the first one screwed you over, what do you clueless fools do… wait a few years and then perk your butts in the air and wait for the next one to screw you.

  61. IDontThinkSo2 November 2, 2012 at 7:49 AM - Reply

    Dripping contempt?

  62. MAwrestler November 2, 2012 at 7:21 AM - Reply

    Psycho-pathological reading of Obama from a conservative propagandist. What would you expect? The article’s tone drips with contempt and hatred of the President. The only thing worse are the commenters who see it as insightful, even though the portrait of Obama hardly resembles the man the American public knows.

  63. ConcernedCitizen November 2, 2012 at 6:16 AM - Reply

    Apparently none of these folks, neither the terribly inept detractors with their fox news style accusations, since no one and I mean no one has been able to find one smidgen of evidence of Obama’s wrongdoing, or the right minded supporters of one of the most important figures in the history of the United States of America, was able to see through this great president’s strategy, which he rightfully kept to himself and will continue to do so. Of course he did not prepare, as he was told to. He played a card very few are willing or prepared enough to play. He played dumb, with the perfect and coherent skill that only a master politician and statesman is able to pull off. He let Mittens win the first one so that his adversary would use that fact to inflate his already overly swollen plastic head. Of course Mittens did exactly that and nearly blew the whole ball game. But his wealthy supporters who would put us back to the middle ages in the name of inhuman laws that respect only the Bubba mentality and the bottom line in their current accounts over the short term got to work to save him from his own idiocy – clearly demonstrated in his choosing such an inept running mate.

    It is very clear that Obama, whether he wins this election or not is a winner and has changed the presidency of the United States of America back from an office held by the likes of W and his great Big Daddy, etc. to the respectable leader of the free world and coherent guide of the most important nation on the face of this earth at present. No one with their bigoted attitudes can take that away from him. You can be sure that if Romney wins, that great office will suffer its worse nightmares again as occurred with W in his first two years with Bin Laden’s attack on the little whiner he had known for so many years, because the little creep deserved it. The innocents killed were of no more import to W than they were to Bin Laden, evidenced by his hiding in an elementary school under his brother’s governorship in Florida during the peak of the crisis, reading a children’s book upside down. Not since Leonardo Da Vinci has someone been so intelligent and capable in his reading and writing skills.

    It’s however not the fault of the supporters of these terrible pretenders as they do not know any better. They listen to bigoted and easily palatable racist views that seem to reflect what they heard from daddy or someone else who taught them that they were supposedly superior. Actually, anyone who does not see that those who are free and wealthy have a duty to protect and instruct those who aren’t so lucky because we are not many races but one humanity – one life that must work for the improvement of all people and all life on this precious planet we inhabit are blind to anything beyond their own noses. Those who only work toward their individual material wealth with no regard for the damage and destruction they have wrought by their daily decisions to support unworthy men and narrow-minded causes, will in the end pay the ultimate price basically because they can never truly be happy or find satisfaction in their lives. Unlike people such as President Obama, who not only truly work for the improvement of all the United States but also for the betterment of the entire world. He is a happy man and needs no other reward that what his actions and development bring him.

  64. Mark Wood November 2, 2012 at 6:08 AM - Reply

    I like how the writer uses big words to make it seem like he has a fucking clue.

  65. psyclone November 2, 2012 at 2:46 AM - Reply

    It’s absolutely hilarious to see how obsessed the Obama-haters are. They glom onto this article’s paranoiac amateur psychology as if they were agreeing with Bill Frist’s video ridiculous diagnosis of Terry Schiavo’s condition from a video, and then piggyback onto the article with their own ridiculous suppositional examples of “human nature”. It’s so adorable that they still are pathetically stuck on a debate performance from nearly a month ago, since apparently that is all they have to hang their hats on. They certainly haven’t had anything else for the past year to get excited about with this disaster of a candidate. (Anyone remember the laughable GOP clown-car primaries? Or was the trauma too awful?) Forget Romney’s pathological and brazenly opportunistic lying – no, that doesn’t merit a mention with this set. And forget how Obama cleaned Romney’s clock in the 2 subsequent debates, especially with that fantastic “bayonets and horses” rejoinder that caught Romney totally flatfooted. No, these things don’t matter to people who themselves don’t give a rat’s ass about Romney – to them he’s just the only available non-Obama, and an ever-diminishing one at that.

    I’m sure their heads would explode if they found out who signed into law a virtually identical health-care bill for Massachusetts! Ha!

    • Matt A. November 2, 2012 at 11:26 AM - Reply

      The whole “Bayonets and horses” quip in regard to the size of the navy was extremely disrespectful of our armed forces. Romney clearly stated that top officials in the US Navy needed more assets to be able to adequately defend America and its interests. Obama said “suck it up and deal with it” in as many words, because “we have better stuff”. Yes we do, but we also have more to deal with. I don’t want someone who thinks he knows better than career professionals in our armed forces making decisions for them. I doubt he knows about the logistics of adequately running our armed forces, and he apparently doesn’t listen to those that do.

      • psyclone November 4, 2012 at 11:43 PM - Reply

        Har! No, Romney was just trying to pull a fast one on the debate audience by playing with numbers and completely mischaracterizing the state of readiness of our armed forces. Only a complete partisan hack would assume that Obama of all people doesn’t understand the capabilities of the US Navy….seriously, based on what? Our battle fleet, as small as Romney seems to think it is, is still larger than the next 13 countries’ battle fleets *combined*. And 11 of those are our allies. So please, spare me Romney’s phony and contrived concern that’s only there to dupe people into thinking that Obama is trying to weaken the country out of malice.

  66. bonesiii November 2, 2012 at 2:24 AM - Reply

    I bet that when he heard he lost, he was FURIOUS at AMERICANS for not adoring him no matter what, as he had dreamed. It came across in the other debates — he was angry at US, not just Romney. Not to mention he came across as totally out of touch with us the first time.

    I know how to read people, and he acted in the other debates exactly how I thought he would. The failure could not be in him — it must be in us, he felt, as I read him, but he felt he needed to woo us anyways, even though he doesn’t really like us. To use us to keep his power. So he hunkered down on those ten total days of very strange debate prep not because he cared about us, but quite the opposite. It was an excuse to get away from us for a while.

    I think most of us picked up on it, though maybe subconsciously.

  67. Larry Waters November 2, 2012 at 2:00 AM - Reply

    I had him pegged as an elitest and a sociopath turns out I was right. Im always right and anyone who disagrees is an fool.

  68. Why. November 1, 2012 at 11:58 PM - Reply

    Why was this article recommended or associated with TIME’s website?

    This news article seems to be more than skewed in favor of one candidate over another, the author here could not remove their feelings to report the facts rather than opinions, and this is not even new anymore. Why is it now on feature??

    It reflects as very unprofessional and is not the kind of article I’d expect to see featured, image and all, by TIME.

    • Matt A. November 2, 2012 at 12:03 PM - Reply

      Do you know how many left-leaning articles there are out there….? Also, this is clearly described as an opinion piece. This is just 1 person’s opinion (albeit one that is shared by quite a few Americans)….

  69. businessman November 1, 2012 at 11:56 PM - Reply

    The commentary here is pretty one sided. However, WingedPegasus, Obama is far from a Marxist and Obama is far from a narcissist. Bush actually told reporters that he could not think of any mistakes he made in 4 years. bytebear, actually Bush had Osama in his sights at Tora Bora and let him go. He did not think it was important. Adkoc, sure he had the numbers but he had bluedog democrats and they did not vote with the Dems due to their more conservative or anti-Obama traits. They are all gone now. Remember? wrongsite.bad is accusing Obama of backing the Muslim Brotherhood … that is simply childish at best. That is a wish that can never be a fact.

  70. jones.barry November 1, 2012 at 11:20 PM - Reply

    I pray we rid ourselves of this awful man on Nov 6

  71. oa426 November 1, 2012 at 11:00 PM - Reply

    you americans are as stupid as you are made out to be if romney wins this election….

  72. Rooney November 1, 2012 at 10:23 PM - Reply

    The guy standing on that stage immediately following the debate clearly looked to me like he knew he got crushed. I’m sure he dramatically underestimated Romney and didn’t properly prepare, so we’re in agreement there. But to say that he had to be told he lost is a bigger testament to your cluelessness than his. Body language that blatant doesn’t lie.

  73. hkjonus November 1, 2012 at 10:00 PM - Reply

    Because I have zero desire to ever visit this Joke site again, Im gonna give it to you right now. OBAMA WON AND I TOLD YOU SO! Enjoy this next Wednesday morning and for another 4 years losers.

    • Matt A. November 2, 2012 at 12:04 PM - Reply

      Haters gonna hate. ’nuff said.

  74. t4rribletp November 1, 2012 at 9:35 PM - Reply

    daily mail uk is a tabloid… in the uk…

  75. AppleOutsider.de - Sebastian P November 1, 2012 at 7:35 PM - Reply

    Let’s just ask a UK newspaper what’s going on in the White House. They should know best.

  76. linzip1212 November 1, 2012 at 7:15 PM - Reply

    He did win!

  77. scootie November 1, 2012 at 6:28 PM - Reply

    Now that’s what I call journalism. Bravo!

  78. prustcw November 1, 2012 at 5:11 PM - Reply

    No main stream press will ever ask the Rock Star President hard questions…makes me sick.

  79. isohappynow November 1, 2012 at 5:11 PM - Reply

    What a stupid article. You have to really stretch things to make Romney’s chronic lying and bullying look good.

  80. TerryM November 1, 2012 at 4:43 PM - Reply

    I was so happy to see this article! As I grow older, I find I am not always as articulate as I once was; I don’t really know why, since I get just as angry at the sort of bullshyte that this president has heaped upon us for the past 3+ years.

    When I listened to Mr. Obama speak for the very first time, I realized that I could never vote for him for anything. Not because he is black; I didn’t even notice that at first, and when I did, I didn’t care. Still don’t. What I did notice, and what almost sent me to my knees (literally), was that the minute he started talking, I could see and hear the ghost of my late and rarely lamented mother. The best way I can describe her, and Mr. Obama as well, is that she was a complete and utter narcissistic bi-polar fright-fest. She apparently saw everyone around her in a shade of gray. She could not conceive of the possibility that anyone could be so boneheaded, and fundamentally evil that they could disagree with her in any way. No-one could have an opinion, wants and needs, or hopes and fears, if she did not allow it. But in that incredibly unlikely event, she was consoled by the fact that they were wrong because, of course, she was right.

    Mr. Obama is a perfect example of my mother. She was, and he is: snarky, sarcastic, dismissive, superior in attitude if not in fact, distainful of all others……well, you get the point. Unfortunately, all she could do is make everyone around her so miserable that they eventually “divorced her” and dragged themselves out of her orbit any way they could. Even more unfortunately, Mr. Obama literally holds all of out lives in his hands. All we can do is hope that enough thinking people will congregate at the voting boxes, and “divorce” Mr. Obama, send him back to his long suffering family and friends, and hope that the damage that he and his satelites have done is reversible at the least.

    However, all I can do is vote, and hope that everyone around me in this still great country will do the same, even if they don’t agree with me. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, find a way to get out and vote. I am in a wheelchair and a lot of pain, and if I can do it, then y’all all can too. May you blessed be, three times three.

  81. MacToney November 1, 2012 at 2:42 PM - Reply

    Beware of articles that have no sources. With the right audience, I could write something similar and have a bunch of idiots believing me too…if you havent questioned this article, you’re one of the idiots…lol

  82. Jean A Wilson November 1, 2012 at 1:38 PM - Reply


  83. lamarchase@hotmail.com October 26, 2012 at 11:14 AM - Reply

    Who the hell are you Romney’s girlfriend jeez And where is this UK .. Give me a break Take care of your own stuff

  84. JerseyGuy October 18, 2012 at 9:35 AM - Reply

    To WingedPegasis, stardud, Kenneally and others of the same warped minds- I honestly believe your heart was in your comments but not your brains. You might want to learn more about true Socialism and Communism before your mouth creates a greater gap in your creditability with what is fact and what is reality. Opinions are fine and we live on these self expressions and grow with them to be a greater society but deceit and lies only undermine your intentions. Who would ever believe your opinions?

    • WingedPegasus October 19, 2012 at 3:54 PM - Reply

      Perhaps when you attack personally and go on to disparage the intellect of those whom you attack you would first look into the credentials of those whom you would disparage. You also may want to present an example or two of why your claims of ignorance against those who have an opinion should be taken seriously.

  85. Tired of it October 15, 2012 at 11:24 AM - Reply

    That’s why we can’t afford four more years of this senile socialist………

  86. RenowN October 15, 2012 at 10:41 AM - Reply

    Oblamo has come around to the conclusion that he stumbled in the first debate because he was “too polite.” Riiight. This Carteresque self-delusion is his ticket back to whatever hellish faculty lounge this poseur comes from. Well-thought out article.

  87. Neal Avery October 14, 2012 at 5:52 PM - Reply

    MISSION ACCOMPLISHED, Leon Panetta gave green light for Bin Laden Raid. Not Obama. Obama was playing golf.

    • AppleOutsider.de - Sebastian P November 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM - Reply

      So basically Obama isn’t responsible for Benghazi then, right?

      Because if you say he can’t take credit for not giving an order that means he can’t be blamed for NOT giving an order either.

      But let me guess in THAT instance you have a different opinion. Basically blame the president of the US for every bad he did and shrug off everything he accomplished. Every achievement is something his underlings did but everything bad that happens he caused directly.

  88. sunnyelf October 14, 2012 at 5:23 PM - Reply

    Obama did win. Fifteen percent of Americans agree with him that he won. The majority is not always right… see however many examples in our history you care to count. Romney changed his story and was all bluster, pretending to move to center and to feel injured by Obama’s reference to his actual recent statements. It’s not uncommon for the loud kid to win an argument in this country, over the quieter kid who has more integrity.

    • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:48 PM - Reply

      @sunnyelf As McEnroe the tennis player used to say ” YOU cannot be serious man ” !!

    • Matt A. November 2, 2012 at 11:34 AM - Reply

      And then look at debate #3….. which was a perfect example of how Romney did that and Obama was “all bluster”. Romney, however, was more respectful than Obama was in his first debate, and Romney did not directly attack the president in the first debate. Looks like Obama didn’t care, and let Romney have it. >.> I think everyone who likes Obama has very weird priorities for our country, otherwise I don’t see how they think he’s a good president.

  89. Greg Hiller October 14, 2012 at 4:42 PM - Reply

    I’m taken a back by this beautifully written article. Such excellent usage of the English language is a rarity.

    I agree to a large extent with the first part of what’s spoken about, and I think that this is a genuine feeling that President Obama holds: Maybe subconsciously; but probably he’s to an extent aware of it, and bases this way of thinking on his far superior education level, his knowledge, the actual facts themselves, and his prior life as an academic, him having been a university professor and lecturer.
    Add to this, that Obama will be much more aware than most of us, that loads of what the other guy says is nonsense, and just spoken out to please a certain audience. As indeed does often seem to be the case with the present Republican candidate.
    From after the point in this text about his aides worrying about his unwill to prepare himself; understandably in my opinion, I find that the substance of this article changes, and becomes unlikely to be reality. More probably extremely unlikely.
    Whatever one can try and criticise Obama for, during a term during which the World has erupted into the most terrible economic turmoil since the 1930’s, one thing stands out. He’s basically a very nice guy, and he’s doing things for the whole country in the best way he sees fit. – I don’t believe a word Romney speaks is true, I’m afraid to say.
    At heart I’d always vote Republican, never Democrat. – However, starting with George W., through McCain, and now again with Romney, I just couldn’t bring myself to vote for any of these candidates.
    I believe that if the GOP had chosen Ron Paul, they’d have won hands down, even if the doctor, medical specialist, anti-war and anti money-wasting candidate, didn’t appeal to all of the more extreme thinking, mainly religious, segments of the electorate. – Ron Paul was also simply much better than Obama.Any small loss of Tea Party type votes would have been overwhelmingly compensated by huge numbers of Democrats who would have supported Paul. It is such a pity that the great majority of Republicans were not able to grasp the intelligence and great ability of this guy.

  90. KCMOfan October 14, 2012 at 3:45 PM - Reply

    This writer is so delusional it’s pathetic. Obama may not have prepared, but I knew the minute he walked over to Michelle, that he knew. He knew he screwed up and he did not need anyone to tell him. Least of all some twerp writer who is trying to mind read.
    Ivan Kennneally is right down there with Denesh D’Souza. Amateur mind readers.

  91. barry j October 14, 2012 at 3:19 PM - Reply

    well no worst than the spin machine propping up ryan and his lack of knowledge of the real world !! and when you make budgets actual numbers go in the boxes that why you little fella have crayons !!!

  92. Kathleen Jamieson-Gargano October 14, 2012 at 3:06 PM - Reply

    Great article. If people could only open their eyes to Obamas” strong narcissism . He is a self-oriented person, the “celebrity in chief”. One of the worst presidents that our beautiful America has ever had. He and Biden are both a disgrace to this country. We need a professional in our White House, not two incompetent fools.

  93. Anthony Caudill October 14, 2012 at 2:53 PM - Reply

    Oh Ivan, I so hope Romney wins so in the resulting chaos I and my buds can pay you a very special visit. Actually I hope Obama wins, but I’d still love to pay you that visit.

  94. Jana October 14, 2012 at 2:31 PM - Reply

    This piece was a LIE put out by the GOP. The author is obviously a paid operative of the GOP machine who stoops to character assassination tactics. Talk about dishonesty and rank hypocrisy. Unfortunately too many people have swallowed this sort of reprehensible propaganda hook, line and sinker.

    • oz33 October 14, 2012 at 7:41 PM - Reply

      just because someone doesnt agree with the messiah it’s a paid operative! you are delusional!

    • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:52 PM - Reply

      AS “smirking Joe” Biden was doing to Ryan in the debate ?!

  95. Lily October 14, 2012 at 11:15 AM - Reply

    Let’s face it, the powers that be, along with Obama have yet to give a plausible reason why he gave such a losing performance at the debate. All things considered, I think the explanations in this article are most likely the reasons.

    • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:53 PM - Reply

      The reason was so obvious…no rehearsal nor teleprompter ! Elementary !

  96. Arthur Anderson October 14, 2012 at 10:46 AM - Reply

    So revealing…!!!!!!!! The fact that he could actually think that after such an uninspired performance…..now, with that same faulty judgement, he is in charge of and carries around with him the device that would unleash thermonuclear he11 on earth………be fearful, be veeeeeeery fearful………………..pray my brothers and sisters………

  97. Canadian October 14, 2012 at 10:07 AM - Reply

    Soo sad it has taken 4 years for some Americans to realize that not all that glitters is gold.While Obama sabotages the American economy,creats division within American society,supports Islamicists throughout North Africa and the Middle-East,allows Islamicists into the gov’t to advise hillary and himself,and weakens American interests in the world,not to mention his attempts through laws to weaken America within and protecting Islamicists from any analysis to better understand their threat to democracy,free speech and to American Judeo-Christian values.Obama has left the USA in a very difficult situation.As a Canadian it saddens me to see a great society and civilization being under-mined by an ideological President who seems to be bent on creating respect for a ideology/religion that will never accept western civilization.Is this a result of arrogance,ignorance or planned by a president who accepts Islam as the answer,as many Muslims do.

  98. ColleenMA October 14, 2012 at 9:22 AM - Reply

    Wow… this explains SO MUCH.

  99. Morris65 October 14, 2012 at 9:00 AM - Reply

    For the longest of times progressive psychologists assumed it a given that many young, black males suffered from a severe lack of self-esteem, until a more perceptive number began to realize the obvious….that too many black males suffered from a hyper-inflated sense of self-esteem and self-image, totally ungrounded in their behavior or reality. If obama had a son…..

  100. Tommy James October 14, 2012 at 5:43 AM - Reply

    Obama was a junior senator – really a no buddy – no experience – no nothing – right place right time running against Hillary and issues G. Bush created – before it is said and done Mitt will win in a landslide!

  101. Jeanne October 14, 2012 at 5:43 AM - Reply

    Not how I see it – biased, unsupported opinion.

  102. person October 14, 2012 at 4:43 AM - Reply

    stupidest article ever.

  103. Gleen Scooter October 14, 2012 at 3:53 AM - Reply

    Obama hates Romney because he is a successful white man who is not afraid to stand up to him and challenge him on all his lies and destruction of America..Would Obama hate him as much if Romey were black? NOPE he would attack him but ot with so much feirce urivaled hate and utter obsessive vile contempt as he does so that makes Obama a Racist as most that have paid attention and ot lapped up the Liberal Media’s LIES have known he is for years!!!

  104. Knotafan October 14, 2012 at 12:28 AM - Reply

    Has anyone else heard about Obozo’s ring? The symbols on it supposedly say,

    “There is no god but Allah”. He has worn it for years on his wedding ring finger, even before he was married. This alone should be ground for some kind of legal action.
    How does he get away with some much? He has sank our country, made illegal “executive decisions”, just for starts, & people still support him. Is it the “free” stuff, or what? Up until about 5 years ago, I didn’t get into politics too much, but my eyes are open now.

    • waraji October 14, 2012 at 3:33 AM - Reply

      President Obama’s ring. Sure, take a look at some pictures and see where your imagination takes you:

    • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:54 PM - Reply

      I agree with your assessment of Obama but I’d like to know more about the ring that he supposedly wears.

  105. seethroughurlies October 13, 2012 at 10:50 PM - Reply

    more lies, propaganda, and speculation. If you subtracted all the BS Romney actually threw out there, what did he actually say in the debate? Nothing. Obama did win if you actually listened to what was said.

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 10:48 AM - Reply

      Delusion. Thanks, and please keep that up until Nov 6?

  106. Caiha October 13, 2012 at 9:50 PM - Reply

    Daily witness, laugh, I thought this was a real news article.

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 10:49 AM - Reply

      It’s called an ‘opinion piece’ doofus. If you want real news go to Fox News.

  107. Rod Miller October 13, 2012 at 9:36 PM - Reply

    By the way, the main job of a president is to protect Americans. The first 911 was a terrorist attack to be sure. This 911 finds the President and his entourage struggling to cover up the murder of Americans and spinning the story hoping to get the truth from coming to light until after the election. I HATE IT WHEN MY GOVERNMENT LIES TO ME. No better than communist Russia telling the big lie so often that people believe it.

  108. Ernest Herbert October 13, 2012 at 9:31 PM - Reply

    so what made bush, or clinton so self aware? do you think romney isnt as self involved and superior? its a status thing, and once you reach a certain level, its human nature to be affected.

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 10:53 AM - Reply

      Clinton wasn’t self-aware. Bill’s a master at the wind of change, and integrity challenged enough that he had no problem throwing all the leftists under the bus in order to get re-elected. Bush was the most self-aware President of the 3, and by far the one who cares about America the most.

  109. Rod Miller October 13, 2012 at 9:30 PM - Reply

    Nice post Linda!

    For a Messiah who walks on water, Obama needs a shallow pond to keep from drowning.

  110. Linda Tognoni October 13, 2012 at 8:48 PM - Reply

    Obama is a socialist disaster for freedom in America. What other presidential administration has been sued by the Catholic church? Liberals are Godless and clueless!

  111. Linda Tognoni October 13, 2012 at 8:46 PM - Reply

    Obama’s is nothing but a teleprompter-ed empty suit with delusions of grandeur who want to be emperor. Totally clueless and dangerous! “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” — Winston Churchill

  112. Editor in Chief My Ass Lol October 13, 2012 at 7:04 PM - Reply

    I stopped reading at the end of the first paragraph. (Apparently, the most transparent President in history in also the least self-aware.) You may want to check for grammar and spelling before attempting to insult the President.

    • sharbell74 October 14, 2012 at 6:31 AM - Reply

      Do you ever read the AP? Huffington Puffington Post? Replete with errors. Doesn’t seem to phase them……………

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 10:56 AM - Reply

      If you’re calling Obama ‘transparent’ it’s YOU who are insulting US. I stopped reading your post after that line.

  113. raptorep October 13, 2012 at 5:49 PM - Reply

    Obama is a failure from a purely political viewpoint, hard facts and numbers don’t lie, the average income of ALL Americans are down over $4K, the middle east is melting down, the economy never recovered and has been about flat since the crash and remember the unemployment numbers ONLY account for those on Unemployment Insurance Benefits NOT those who have given up or who are under employed, the number may go down but the reality is there is still too few jobs being created. Bush gave us a mess, but Obama has done very little to help either despite rhetoric and misleading employment numbers, the reality doesn’t match what is coming from the President’s mouth.

  114. lerose55 October 13, 2012 at 4:47 PM - Reply

    I think the article says it all. Obama have been traveling, campaigning, being on daytime & nighttime talk shows laughing and clowning around, dinner parties with the stars, dinners at the White House w/ different sporting teams members. It must be nice on the American peoples money, and yet he finds it a bore to study for the debate, what is wrong with this picture. The White House was not meant to be party time. And then he has a bad attitude, his way or no way. He is bleeding our Countries finances. Medical Ins. thats mandatory and will not be very affortable-Socializing us and then fines to people who cannot afford it. What is he going to put people in jail? I am out of work for almost 2 years now, I cannot pay for the first time in my life. This past 4 years has to been the worse, yes it started w/Bush, but Obama has multipiled that several, times over. He claims unemployment is down, what about all the people that gave up finding job, what about the people who had full time jobs and could only replace it with a part time job, and with that no medical benefits. Plus the people who grabbed the Seasonal Jobs, and come January they will be out of work again. Unemployment numbers back over 8% again. Obama should bow out leave the Presdency, and that will save our Country from bankruptcy. We were not important enough for you to forgo your site seeing the day of your debate. He and the Mrs. might as well take some more vacations on the American people before they are out of the White House for good. You should all go on the site see what the Obamas are having built for his retirement house in Hawaii, after they leaves the White House. I hope we are not paying for it. It will be ready in 2014 or 2016 not sure. Its Beautiful

  115. Jeffery Topps October 13, 2012 at 4:47 PM - Reply

    During an interview with Brett Baier in 2010, Obama revealed that he didn’t like “the process” in D.C. By that he meant having to compromise, discuss and work with the opposition. He was very clear in that he would prefer to act unilaterally. Recall his childish, “I won!,” early on in his presidency. He has taken this to heart with his excessive Executive Orders. A second term will be more of the same and less of the way the government was created to operate.

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 10:58 AM - Reply

      That’s spot-on. Obama has become the most Imperialistic, tyrannical President we’ve ever had. The courts will be working for years after we send Barry home in Nov to undo all the illegal executive orders decreed by this would-be king.

  116. MattO October 13, 2012 at 4:25 PM - Reply

    Its not that Obama has disdain for Romney, he is intimidated by him

  117. Max Planc October 13, 2012 at 3:57 PM - Reply

    Does the author know he’s a moron, or should one of us break the news to him?

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 11:01 AM - Reply

      I’m sure your negative opinion will devastate him all the way to his next article. Next time try rebutting like you have a brain and some integrity, rather than confirming your leftist vacuousness by spouting your pointless insults.

  118. confused October 13, 2012 at 3:18 PM - Reply

    I don’t understand if people are being sarcastic or not

  119. CruzerDog October 13, 2012 at 1:58 PM - Reply

    Great article…. It’s right on….

    Obama will never match up well on stage to Romney.

    Romney is raised from grounded principals, Obama is a narcissist. Nothing under Obama but soft clay….

    I’m looking to Obama to duct the next debate because he can’t win, and George Soros knows it…..

  120. NedReader October 13, 2012 at 1:48 PM - Reply

    Obama was told to hide his anger no matter what and because he was concentrating on that he delivered a limp, flaccid performance in the first debate.
    Biden was told to attack but to always smile while you attack because if you smile you won’t come accross as mean. So he concentrated on smiling and he delivered a disturbingly sneering, disrespectful performance.
    So my prediction is that Obama’s advisors will tell him to try to dominate in the next debate and without Obama’s normal anger controls in place he will give an angry rage filled performance which will be just as devastating to his campaign as his listless flaccid performance in the first debate.

  121. EnoughAlready911 October 13, 2012 at 1:20 PM - Reply

    Romney needs to respectfully pluck those strings which get under Obama’s skin…..Obama won’t be able to handle it and reveal his snarling but normally hidden fangs. If this happens it will definitely be over for Obama.

    Debate 1: A delicious steak to a hungry citizenry
    Debate 2: 6 layer Chocolate Dessert
    Debate 3: Cigar and Cognac

    R&R = Repair and Recovery

  122. henrytobias October 13, 2012 at 12:24 PM - Reply

    Perhaps that’s his problem. He thinks he’s better than everyone else.

  123. RickC October 13, 2012 at 12:23 PM - Reply

    It shows the mans mindset. He is a narcisist and a megalomaniac. We should be fearful thst such a defective personality could ever have been put in such a powerful position in this day and age.

  124. Beth Kissel October 13, 2012 at 12:20 PM - Reply

    How out of touch could he be?? I think he smoked too much weed while at Harvard and his brain cells are dying at mock speed. He’s such an embarassment to this country.

  125. VHG1 October 13, 2012 at 12:14 PM - Reply

    We’ve been experiencing the end results of what the laziest, most inept, incompetent, in over his head junior high level political hack has done to us over the past 4 years! He likes to vacation, campaign, talk alot and pretend his brilliant! But we know him for what he ios, an abject failure who can’t tie his own shoelaces!

    • Mike Hock October 13, 2012 at 2:41 PM - Reply

      I suppose you are the brilliant hack with an above junior high level education. That is why you post with such astounding grammatical accuracy. Hey, mabey you should run for President. Ostensibly, you are rather ingenious, which is an antithetical condition for most Republican adherents.

      • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 11:04 AM - Reply

        Why are leftists so ugly, mean, condescending, racist, and tyrannical? Insult, distract (grammar?! are you serious?), and deny. Very cerebral.

  126. Watchamacallit October 13, 2012 at 12:03 PM - Reply

    Blaw blaw blaw blaw. Blaw blaw Obama blaw blaw. Mitt Rob-me blaw blaw blaw. No President will save you Amercian fools.

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 11:05 AM - Reply

      True. We have to get rid of all Democrats in Congress too. Thanks for your help, your comment probably sent 10 voters to our side.

  127. droolz October 13, 2012 at 11:44 AM - Reply

    couldn’t have said it better myself….. very good…

  128. Rebecca Fine October 13, 2012 at 11:44 AM - Reply

    Romney is a pathological liar and a sociopath. He should be legally prevented from even being allowed to be President. Most Americans would not want to have to debate him.

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 11:07 AM - Reply

      Most Americans agree with Romney, why would we debate him? Funny how leftists are screaming “liar” but offer no examples. You don’t even know what sociopath means, or you’d be calling Obama that.

  129. Max Damon October 13, 2012 at 11:14 AM - Reply

    Obama is not Commander In Chief. He is Commander in S#&T!

  130. Recal October 13, 2012 at 10:50 AM - Reply

    Truly saddened with the comments on both sides of the argument. I mean jeez, it’s a biased article, big deal. Then everyone goes on to talk about the socialist Muslim terrorist Obama really is. That’s just dumb. Then liberals do nothing and just call the other side dumb. This is the worst campaign ever, and it disgraces me that both halves of the population are only concerned with hating on the other. Even as a hardcore liberal, I really think we need to get over it. Stop with the stupid cheep shots, and discuss actual issues.

    • Mojo the Awkward October 13, 2012 at 11:34 AM - Reply

      I agree that ad hominems debase the discourse; having said that, character is a valid consideration in electoral politics, and there is abundant empirical evidence that Obama’s character is self-aggrandizing, hubristic, overconfident, and dismissive of ideas that don’t chime with his own.
      Although a lot has been made of Romney’s own diffidence and lack of ‘chumminess,’ there’s little doubt that underneath the stiffness and formality, the Governor has a generous and compassionate heart. In the midst of a foaming attack-dog performance in the VP debate, Biden admitted that even he didn’t doubt Romney’s personal commitment to individuals. The willingness of the Obama-Biden ticket to attack Romney’s character by casting aspersions on his treatment of schoolmates, pets, and the cancer-struck wives of workers at plants his company once invested in (and look for a second objectively at how tenuous that last connection – which itself overstates the linkage beyond the point of mendacity, and constitutes the dirtiest, most inaccurate, cheap shot in the history of politics – really is, and ask yourself what that says about the desperation of Team Obama) represents a pragmatic calculation about their best electoral strategy. Romney’s own much-ballyhooed pivot to the center after appealing to his base during the primary represents a similar kind of calculation – but, I would submit, Romney has done what every Presidential candidate has done in the era of political parties, whereas Obama has plumbed new depths.
      Naturally, I’m writing this from the perspective of somebody who thought Obama exhibited dangerous signs of vainglory back in 2008; candidly, I’ll tell you that I’m not completely delighted with Romney, since I’m a libertarian and he really isn’t one. But I do think he cleaves closer to the mainstream than does Obama – that’s not so much a comment on his ideological positions as his willingness to make those considerations secondary to the paramount goal of achieving buy-in from stakeholders to a decision and translating that into productive outcomes.
      The President is, by his own admission, somebody who would rather implement a tax rate hike on the rich EVEN IF doing so reduced the amount and proportion of taxes paid by the rich. He made this claim, presumably, because he is THAT CERTAIN this would not result, despite the mass of historical data that shows the surprising and counterintuitive truth about marginal income tax rates and their relation to growth and revenues (the alternative, that he believes it is more important that the rich APPEAR to pay more taxes to low-information voters than that they actually DO pay, would make him either more stupid or more cynical than I’m prepared to believe on the balance of the available evidence).
      We can say that Romney, at a Republican primary, pledged that he wouldn’t raise $1 in taxes even in exchange for $10 in cuts – but that is something of an entirely different nature, reflecting a firm and consistent conviction from the Governor that raising marginal tax rates on individual income stifles growth and reduces overall revenues. Romney and Ryan, and myself for what that’s worth, believe that when Presidents implement marginal tax rate cuts and commit to supporting entrepreneurial innovation, as John F Kennedy did, as Reagan did, then the results are significant economic growth and expansion of the tax base with concomitant revenue increases. Heck, Bush in 2006 was taking in half a trillion more in tax revenues than Clinton ever did – and a larger proportion of those were paid by the infamous ‘millionaires and billionaires’ because his pro-growth tax policy created more of them to pay taxes. Bush didn’t get the full benefit of tax policy, partly because he dallied with demand-side cuts that have less growth impact, but mainly because of his deficit spending fetish. Obama, of course, has allied a continuation of these ills – to a heightened degree – with a demonization of business and a pile of red tape. Unsurprisingly, economic growth lags even the weak pace under Bush as a result.
      Obama’s campaign rests on convincing voters that nobody could do a better job. Even George W Bush did a better job. That’s why I’m voting for the alternative: Hope and Change.

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 11:10 AM - Reply

      I’m truly saddened that you don’t have the judgment to tell the difference between the Democrats divisiveness, distraction, and outright lying, and the GOP’s simple statements of the truth of Obama and Democrat’s record. Judgment is a required survival mechanism when it’s based on facts and fairness. I’m a lifelong registered Independent, no party ax to grind, but it’s clear to me that Democrats are no longer interested in a strong, successful Republic.

  131. Dana Eslinger October 13, 2012 at 9:51 AM - Reply

    How anyone could believe this amateur worthy of this high office with a straight face has some serious mental issues to deal with. What an embarrasment to this country.

  132. Kay October 13, 2012 at 7:52 AM - Reply

    Really well written article. Good job!

  133. 4grands October 13, 2012 at 7:30 AM - Reply

    Sorry about Kennedy, meant Kenneally, my iPad speller took over.

  134. 4grands October 13, 2012 at 7:28 AM - Reply

    And there we have it in a nutshell. Ivan Kennedy, you keep on talking…..don’t stop. Great words.

  135. waraji October 13, 2012 at 5:45 AM - Reply

    This is a fake article. Do you think somebody really interviewed the president’s advisers ? …If you do, I have some gold to sell you at half price. ^o^

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 11:14 AM - Reply

      It’s called an ‘opinion piece’ doofus. Sheesh.

  136. Vick October 13, 2012 at 2:41 AM - Reply

    that guy (Ob) atleast tried ….

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 11:15 AM - Reply

      No, Obama was never interested in real solutions to our problems. He only is interested in his socialist agenda.

  137. Me October 13, 2012 at 1:16 AM - Reply

    Hate the President much Ivan? The only contempt an objective observer spots here is yours.

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 11:15 AM - Reply

      You should probably read the comments if you’re looking for more contempt for our useless POTUS.

  138. Alex October 13, 2012 at 12:52 AM - Reply

    The truth is some sections of Americans are just interested in personality issues. To me it’s not about how best the candidates talk that matters. There are great distinction between speech and action. Americans should not depend their future on mere words of politicians. The truth is Americans really need help for a better future. The American problem was not created by Obama, the problem in my view started long ago but they didn’t realize it. The bush Administration really destroyed the American economy since the government per security issues over spent and was war oriented than focusing on the deficits. Likewise the banks just looking to their gain margins. America at this moment needs unity of action not just a section of politicians to use mere words to guarantee the safety of Americans. It’s not time for which party or personality to fix the problem. We shouldn’t look at parties, if then one can say the democrates will be better since Mr. Clinton fix the economy, gave it to Mr. Bush who destroyed it by going to fight an enemy that he has no direct plan to fight and rather destroyed innocent countries. I think the Obama administration is under a lot PREASURE causing the Americans not to look back and see the great jobs they are doing from inheriting an economy attacked by financial crisis whose real identity was revealed by Mr. Bush and the Wall Street etc, killing Osama who Mr. Bush used as a medium to cause collateral damage to innocent individuals and several countries who depend on the US currency etc for survival. Americans like any other country needs unity at this moment. God bless America

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 11:18 AM - Reply

      Whew, that was painful to read, and a complete waste of my time, thanks for nothing. The reality is on Nov 6 we have a choice between continuing the Obama disaster and recovering America under Romney and the GOP. Please join us in reality?

  139. Little serpent October 13, 2012 at 12:50 AM - Reply

    Of course, Mr. Obama won the debate.
    He let Romney to burn himself with so much lies and lack of basic arithmetic.
    The studies he mentioned need to be run by a 5th grader for approval.
    Okay, media, okay…they need to keep in business so they will do whatever to get audience and get paid for advertisement.
    Yeap, media can teach Romney and Ryan a lot more corruption tricks to do business 🙂

    • wvobiwan October 14, 2012 at 11:20 AM - Reply

      Bwahahahaha! Denial, delusion, and just dumb. C ya in Nov lefty, briefly. But don’t worry, we conservatives will fix Obama’s disasters and that’ll help you too.

  140. Glen Broemer October 12, 2012 at 11:54 PM - Reply

    if you listened to the arguments, he won the debate. if you watched the grandstanding, you might see it otherwise. shouldn’t winning amount to stating the better arguments?

  141. Jolly_Imam October 12, 2012 at 11:49 PM - Reply

    our glorious mis-leader kept looking down at his feet because little Obamaprompters were attached to his shoes.

  142. Spud October 12, 2012 at 11:34 PM - Reply

    For almost four years now we’ve been seeing Ayn Rand’s dystopia coming
    to life: Obama cronyism in the government and big business, manipulative
    media, corrupted education, dying economy, social stratification,
    massive poverty, unemployment, and disillusionment – all the result of a
    well-meaning attempt to “fundamentally transform” this country on the
    basis of “giving everyone his fair share.”

    • waraji October 13, 2012 at 6:16 PM - Reply

      Is *corporate welfare* mentioned in Ayn Rand’s “dystopia”?

  143. OrthoStice October 12, 2012 at 11:19 PM - Reply

    Or, maybe, he just assumed that the American people were smart enough to notice that they were being fed a steady diet of manure for two hours. Obama’s “failure” was overestimating the intelligence of undecided voters.

  144. Tj Irish October 12, 2012 at 10:51 PM - Reply

    This writer is the editor of the daily Witness. Go over to the website and look at it! it’s an Obama hatefest website. MY POINT? Ivan has ZERO credilbility in his posts other than the fact he hates the President. Move along nothing to see here except an Obama hater. I do agree Obama should have prepared for the debate better, But I have not seen any factual reporting stating Obama thought he won the debate or that his disdain is for Romney is on the scale Ivan says it is. In fact I have seen reports people physically at the debate said Obama’s head was down because he was writing notes. No doubt a mistake on his part but it wasn’t because he had soo much disdain for Romney he couldn’t look him in the eye. DO YOU PEOPLE ON HERE GET IT?. This guy Ivan hates Obama! FINE that is his right to hate Obama. But don’t let his hate cloud the facts as to why Obama lost the debate. Ivan is seeing what he wants to see in the President. I totally disagree with Ivana other than the fact I do agree Obama should have been better prepared for the debate.

    • fd1001 October 13, 2012 at 8:37 AM - Reply

      “But I have not seen any factual reporting stating Obama thought he won the debate”

      First sentence of his article reads: ACCORDING to and article in the Daily Mail UK

  145. Tj Irish October 12, 2012 at 10:42 PM - Reply

    There were good points about the President being prepared for debate. But then the author shows hs hate for Obama by going off on Obam about the world falling apart etc…WHAT RUBBISH, Fact the Libyan startegy of removing Qaddafi cost this country $1 billion dollars. This guy goes off into neo con fairyland about Obama thinking he can charm the middle east etc.. It’s total BS! Obama has done alot of good for this country. To paint him in one brush as some arrogant non reflective guy is soo baseless. Let’s reverse the debate. Romney reversed almost every position he previously stated in the debate. Romney’s 47% comment sure looks like Romney wrote off almost half the electorate as not him being concerned about. As Obama has said as President he represents all Americans. Not just the people who voted for him.
    Guys like this Ivan Kenneally want to get this country into a war with Iran. You think about that when you look at your teenage son who is thinking about joining the military.

  146. RealLife October 12, 2012 at 10:21 PM - Reply

    1. Every 80 years the world goes into a catastrophic event, namely a world war. 2. Mitt Romney is just the man to start that. 3. Why is the US Legal System bringing out a new “Mass Murder” policy and investing in $billions in arming the police 4. Given the strength of the Bilderburg Group, seems to me Obama’s puppetry days have come to an end.

  147. ScottB October 12, 2012 at 10:12 PM - Reply

    The “fool” playing president with the “joker” as V.P.

  148. lilacslmb October 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM - Reply

    I see Ivan likes to talk & write trash. Voting Obama!

  149. Beverly Wantanabe October 12, 2012 at 8:39 PM - Reply

    The bottom line is … like MLK, Al Sharpton, and Jessie Jackson, Obama sees himself as a great “orator”, “preacher” … where “style over substance” in a one-way dialogue can work.

    Remember, too, he’s never had a real job … from a “burn the Constitution” college education under the tutelage of the “grand masters” of socialism, he jumped right in to teaching what he had just learned [with no experience added] to a flock of willing sheep. A few years later, he’s President … all because George W was an idiot and he gave a “glorious” speech four years earlier.

    And he gets elected because 95% of black voters voted for him. [That surely tells us who the real racists in this country are, no?]

  150. Bo Tse Huang October 12, 2012 at 8:13 PM - Reply

    sos , it is about freedom 我被不明人士24小時,監視,騷擾,恐嚇,跟蹤,辱罵,在房間做舍麼,上舍麼網,他們都知道,從99年4月底到現在,房間不知從那傳來罵人和敲擊的聲音,跟人講電話時手機還傳來罵人的聲音,我的門號跟無線網路都是遠傳的,上班的時候也是,騎車時也跟著罵,我在東京都的駐點俠隱社區當夜班保全,另一個保全是趙忠賢,還會讀心術,我心理想舍麼他們都知道,有人證,也可以測謊,有不少住戶知道,他們一直想整死我,之前住在臺灣新竹縣湖口鄉信勢村龍安街40號b11室跟b13室,目前住新竹縣湖口鄉明德街冠湖大樓60-9號3樓 ,電話0976063802,名字是黃伯策,還有很多沒講,事情是我在大陸時開始的,二個,但我在台灣時已經被他們盯上了,我姑姑,爸爸,二哥,奶奶都知道 一直用奇怪的聲音干擾我和我周圍人的神經.我身上有錄到一些證據.車號751bsk L2j212 5436vz可能是 讀心術是完全一字不漏把我腦中所想講出來 另外還有很多沒講的 我有上傳一些影片到youtube 我的頻道上 我可能會失蹤 被逼瘋 逼死 意外身亡 我身體本來就差 他們會找很多方法弄死我又能讓其他人以為跟他們沒關桸 或找不知道的人弄死我 期間我聽到有住戶說財團 說要整死我 說oo人都這樣 說我是oo黨 說你們這些oo人 說性oo的都這樣 我如果一段時間沒有留言或寄郵件 表示我已被逼自殺 遇害或失蹤 發瘋 因為身體本來就差 目前我的facebook and yahoo 沒辦法留言和貼文 I is unknown people 24 hours, monitored, harassment, intimidation, track, insults, in room do homes what, Shang homes what network, they are know, from April 99 end of to now, room not know from that came curse and percussion of sound, with people told phone Shi phone also came curse of sound, I of door, with wireless network are is far pass of, work of when is, bike Shi also followed scolded, I in Tokyo of resident points Grand implicit community Dang night preservation, another preservation is officials, also will read indicates, I heart ideal homes what they are know, Was card, also can measuring lie, has many households know, they has been wanted to whole died I, zhiqian live in Taiwan Hsinchu County Hukou Township letter potential village long street 40th, B11 room with B13 room, currently live Hsinchu County Hukou Township out de Street Crown Lake building 60-9, 3 building, phone 0976063802, name is he rummages about in strategy, also has many didn’t told, things is I in continent Shi began of, II a, but I in Taiwan Shi has is they at Shang has, I aunt, Dad, II brother, Grandma are knowHas been with strange of sound interference I and I around people of neural. I who has recorded to some evidence. car, 751bsk L2j212 5436vz may is read indicates is full a words not leak to I brain in the by wanted to told out also also has many didn’t told of I has upload some movie to YouTube I of channel Shang I may will missing is forced mad forced died accident died I body originally on poor they will found many method kills I also can let other people thought with they didn’t closed XI or found not know of people kills I I heard residents said the Consortium said to me that say I OO OO people party said you OO OO so I said that if people did not leave a message or send a message that for some time I had been forced to commit suicide were killed or missing and crazy because of the already poor health I Facebook and Yahoo can’t message and paste the text

    • Spud October 12, 2012 at 11:37 PM - Reply


  151. thoughtful October 12, 2012 at 8:11 PM - Reply

    This is an extremely biased article.

  152. Angel Ear October 12, 2012 at 8:10 PM - Reply

    finally someone who wrote with excellence the true inner workings of king obama, bravo to Ivan, than you for speaking the truth loud and proud

  153. aexcorp October 12, 2012 at 8:05 PM - Reply

    The choice of words in this article tells more of a story about the author than he tells us about Obama. I like my reading to at least have a little bit of two-sidedness…

    • hottrika October 12, 2012 at 9:36 PM - Reply

      Truth is not that everyone can easily palate.

  154. Brian Biggers October 12, 2012 at 7:54 PM - Reply

    If you read this article and believe it is written by an unbiased reporter then you are being mislead. This guy makes no mention as to where he receives his information and is wearing his political views on his sleeve. This reminds me of a blog, not a news report. You all support this kind of work? You should put your opinions aside and not support articles that try to report opinions as news when it does harm to what journalism stands for. Do any of you care about what journalism stands for?

    • hottrika October 12, 2012 at 9:39 PM - Reply

      For a change this is the real Journalism, a far cry from the Politically Correct BS dished out by mainstream American media in the misplaced belief of “balancing” and “objectivity”. Sometimes it is nice to know the truth as it is.

  155. Predestined October 12, 2012 at 7:37 PM - Reply

    America loves its President!! How does the saying go….”You get what you deserve?”

  156. SpeakOfTheTruth October 12, 2012 at 7:37 PM - Reply

    I feel like he is being extremely misrepresented. These may have been the actions he took, but certainly the words this writer uses are extreme, and exaggerate, misinterpret them. They are being twisted, because I know for certain he cares more than that. Don’t be fooled, really. Romney is a snake, and I’ll bet he only cares for a select few of Americans. Let not our minds stray to the realm of dimness.

  157. Robert Illes October 12, 2012 at 7:14 PM - Reply

    I thought he won too, when I watched the debate, and, insofar he didn’t tell 38 lies in 47 minutes, or whatever the ratio for Romney was, he did win. His biggest criticism was from loud mouths like Chris Matthews and Ed Schultz after the debate (forget Fox; they wrote their views before the debate) – arguably “progressives” – who were most angry that he didn’t counter Romney’s lies. That’s what’d I’d call faint praise. Mark McGwire was the greatest slugger ever – till he copped to steroids. So why was Romney such a big winner?

  158. Guest October 12, 2012 at 7:00 PM - Reply

    Pseudo-intellectual, hyper-paranoid republicans everywhere. Holy crap.

  159. DianaPawelski October 12, 2012 at 6:21 PM - Reply

    BO was looking at his shoes because LIARS cannot look you in the eye.

    • waraji October 14, 2012 at 3:11 AM - Reply

      Plenty of liars will look you straight in the eye.

      • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:43 PM - Reply

        You are correct about the eye contact and Obama did it to the American public (and the world) n 2008) but it isn’t going to work this time. !

  160. Sharon Taylor October 12, 2012 at 6:13 PM - Reply

    Another bit of disdain from the one who would be king were it not for men like Romney and Ryan. Mr. Obama’s disdain for America has been evident for a long time now with his plans for redistribution. And he has almost made it….just a few more last minute things to put into place….then the Romney-Ryan team stepped in when Americans began to wise up to the president’s agenda. His plan is coming unraveled and the anger shows on his face. Pray for all Americans standing for our Constitutional system of Law. Mr. Obama cannot have four more years to complete his agenda for America. Thanks for listening.

  161. anafreeka October 12, 2012 at 5:45 PM - Reply

    Well, Romney did win on the lying throughout the debate. What an idiot!

  162. LeoNavarro October 12, 2012 at 3:24 PM - Reply

    So I detect Malarkey?

  163. CoffeeNerves October 12, 2012 at 3:12 PM - Reply

    It’s hard to believe this “president” is so narcissistic and self-absorbed that he actually thought he won the Debate? Wow! Talk about “out of touch with reality.”
    One and DONE and good riddance!
    Romney/Ryan for RECOVERY!

  164. THE LIVING GOD October 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM - Reply

    yeah! romney has been groomed for this by his church since the nineteen seventies. I discussed prophecies with the mormons about a mormon take over of the world. this is not bull…!
    obama are you aware of the fact that the warning, and op order for obl were written in 2002 by ME!
    I was arrested by a catholic church in az. for things I did not do, and I will destroy this country by doing nothing. congress has been told what to do repeatedly on various websites over the years.

  165. Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:54 PM - Reply

    LOL I guess my post got deleted. I see what kind of “journalists” are at work at this site! Very sad.

  166. Patterman October 12, 2012 at 2:37 PM - Reply

    This is the biggest bunch of bull hockey I’ve ever read. The Rethugs believe in democracy? If you think that, you are really suckers.

  167. Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:19 PM - Reply

    Right, Obama is the one who has a disdain for Americans. Yet Romney is
    the one who casts 47% of American’s aside because “its not his job to
    worry about them – i can’t convince them to take personal responsibility
    and care for their lives.”

    Yet this author extrapolates all this
    hate from Obama simply not wanting to prep for debate? Talk about
    twisted up misleading BS and lies! Try again Ivan.

  168. jessix October 12, 2012 at 1:23 PM - Reply

    I don’t see how Obama can prepare for a debate. He is unable to think on his feet and when speaking off the cuff he will make worse “gaffes” than Biden.

    Barack Obama has no basic knowledge of the workings of the presidency. He is not smart and this is immediately obvious to those who meet him in person. He has nothing to say because his head is nearly “empty”.

    Obama’s empty Harvard credentials were affirmative action gifts. Obama is not bad as an actor. He has carried this charade by himself for over 3 years.

    How can he “fake” his participation in a debate? He doesnt know how to do anything, but he is good at designating chores and taking credit for what others accomplish.
    I’m surprised that his supporters saw how ineffective he was immediately and almost immediately came out of their communal “spell” that must have been cast over all of them as a group.

    Few continue to make excuses for him after his performance in the first debate. This itself is amazing to me.

    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:37 PM - Reply

      Did you watch the 08 debates? Lets ask McCain what he thinks…

      No i make no excuses for his passive performance, but you certainly aren’t making any excuses for the lies Romney/Ryan have perpetrated in their debates.

      • Jessica Lucinda Williams October 13, 2012 at 11:09 AM - Reply

        it is just anti-Obama rhetoric. even if affirmative action got him in the door, it can not account for him making it to the top of his class. for someone to even bring that up, let’s me know what they really feel. i just hate when people don’t deal in facts, but childish criticism. i’m no political science or economics major, but i can check facts, and some of these people lead me to believe, they never have checked facts about either side. opinions you can argue with, not facts.

        • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:40 PM - Reply

          “Not checked facts ?”
          We are talking about politicians here, are we not ?

      • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:38 PM - Reply

        “Passive” performance?? you mean as opposed to his usual performance (staged).Let’s see now,he won the Nobel Prize (Ha ha !) for doing nothing so maybe he could win an Oscar for best actor ! …do you think ?

    • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:33 PM - Reply

      I guess he can’t play an instrument as he is “in” with the celebrities” as Slick Willie Clinton was ,and I would have tjhought he’d attend the upcoming rally? Maybe that’s why he isn’t going to attend with Springsteen on guitar and Clinton on sax while he could play the tin flute as he has demonstrated that he can be the Pied Piper of Washington leading the “sheeple” to their own destruction.

  169. Dejay October 12, 2012 at 1:17 PM - Reply

    As an outsider who happened to watch the debate, I thought Obama won too – he simple had the better answers. Romney couldn’t explain anything he wants to do and flip flopped again on his positions. Why do people get blinded by empty rhetorics? Arguments and facts should count, not waving around like an empty shirt in the wind.
    So how DO you debate with someone who is dishonest?

    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:40 PM - Reply

      Like Biden did i guess. Its not easy when the things they’ve said for months during the campaign and you’ve studied on in debate prep they now come out and completely walk away from. Slippery as a snake has new meaning.

    • Steve Cox October 12, 2012 at 2:58 PM - Reply

      Your an outsider? Talk about who is being dishonest.. Obama lost by a mile and beyond.

      • Dejay October 12, 2012 at 11:27 PM - Reply

        I would define dishonesty as saying one thing while meaning something else. Saying one thing and then suddenly saying something else is either dishonest or at the very least it’s stupid and inconsistent. People should be outraged by this behavior and not overly polite and soft debate performance.
        Sure I’m biased. As an European, my stake in this election is to see someone DIPLOMATIC to avoid an escalation of the middle east crisis. Force alone will not help against Russia’s and China’s oil interests in the region.

  170. jessix October 12, 2012 at 12:56 PM - Reply

    It’s little wonder Obama feels this way. As an Affirmative Action student all he needed to do was to show up! He didn’t have the requirements other students had; The difficult ones were waived for Affirmative Action students.

    As for grading, Harvard stopped giving grades in order to “better accomodate Affirmative Action students”. Barry Soetoro was a class “pet” of sorts and fellow students helped him through any difficulties that remained.

    When one has depended on Affirmative Action for years to get through, one cannot take credit for “accomplishments” – they didn’t build anything on their own – Somebody else made that happen”!

    “Editor of the Harvard Law Review” was the affirmative action gift that fooled the intellectual Liberals. None would suspect such a sacriligious “gift” that indicated the smartest of the smart Harvard students was given to an Affirmative Action student just so Harvard could be written up by the NY Times as having named it’s “First Black Student Named Editor of the Harvard Law Review”.

    This is the type of publicity Harvard craves and they went to an extreme to get it This was the first and only time in over 100 years of Harvard history that such a student, (non-honors, no achievements) was given this position.

    We haven’t seen Harvard bragging about this president have we?

    I wonder why?

    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM - Reply

      You know very little about Affirmative Action and how it affects students educational requirements. Go read some more Ayn Rand.

  171. River of Light October 12, 2012 at 12:39 PM - Reply

    Biased Garbage!

  172. DixieRecht October 12, 2012 at 12:39 PM - Reply

    How much more evidence do we need that this narcissist is out of his depth?

    BO is incapable of handling the duties of POTUS. Need more proof?

    >In front of the UN, blaming a video for the terrorist attack in Libya
    >Failure to stop other embassies from being overrun
    >Fast & Furious
    >Our national debt up $5 trillion
    >QE1, QE@, QE3 and still economy in doldrums
    >USA lost its AAA credit rating.

    I could go on but the verdict is in: WE CANNOT AFFORD FOUR MORE YEAR.


    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:27 PM - Reply

      We are indeed better off than we were four years ago.

  173. Sigmund Derman October 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM - Reply

    If it were scored like most debates in college and highschool debate clubs, I think Obama would have been the winner. His points were for the most part accurate and honest. Romney was just saying what his advisors had told him would sound good at the moment even though much of what he said contradicted his prior stands, logic, and the rules of mathematics. But, of course, that is not what matters for these sound bite style debates. To paraprase an old line from Captain Kirk of the old Star Trek, when will Obama learn that he’s not playing chess, he’s playing poker (and full contact poker at that).

    • kela October 12, 2012 at 1:27 PM - Reply

      you are spot on, how can Americans be swept off their footing so cheaply like this!!!. Obama inherited a “sinking America” at least in economic terms, being captained by a republican. keeping it afloat deserves a credit. Even an averagely intelligent person can see that

  174. sara October 12, 2012 at 12:36 PM - Reply

    Congratulations to Ivan Kenneally for an excellent article on the American President Barak Hussein Obama…. for the meantme that is….until November 6th. No-one can know just WHO will be the next President of the Most Powerful Country in the World today after that awesome day and may one be forgiven for hoping and praying it will not be he, the one born in Kenya {as opposed to being born in Hawaii as he maintains}.. and raised in Indonesia, namely Barak Hussein Obama.

    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:27 PM - Reply

      It’ll either be Romney or Obama, so i think we know who it’ll be…

      I know simple concepts don’t penetrate your birther brain, but try a little harder next time.

  175. Donna Kay Bynum October 12, 2012 at 11:33 AM - Reply

    this president is clueless!!!

    • Tj Irish October 12, 2012 at 10:52 PM - Reply

      No Donna you are the one who is clueless. Really when Obama ordered the bin laden mission was he clueless that day. See how ignorant your statement looks Donna. Get your head outta your azz.

      • Stephen Cothren October 12, 2012 at 11:12 PM - Reply

        Yes he was….a Muslim fool…then and now. Idiot.

        • Duh November 2, 2012 at 7:46 AM - Reply

          You sound so very ignorant being a Muslim does not make you a bad person…smashing a plane into a skyscraper does. Come on people you are making everyone in America look bad like worse than our Education rating makes us look. Take off the tinfoil hat…please?

          • Christopher Weaver November 2, 2012 at 11:10 AM -

            I would argue that YOU make America look bad with your sycophantic acceptance of everything that the Dear Leader utters. BTW, screw what the world thinks of America. That only seems to be of utmost importance to libturds anyhow…

          • Truth November 3, 2012 at 9:05 AM -

            you are racist

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:21 PM -

            “Tinfoil hat” ? interesting description…….meaning ??

      • Brandon Haugen October 12, 2012 at 11:15 PM - Reply

        Obama had as much to do with getting Osama as he did with “saving” the economy.

        • stardud October 13, 2012 at 2:18 AM - Reply

          You got that right!

        • Jessica Lucinda Williams October 13, 2012 at 10:46 AM - Reply

          you people are too funny, had it been Romney or Bush or any other president to order the hit on Bin Laden, they would have been praised for their decision, and held as a hero for killing our biggest enemy, but since it was this “socialist, marxist, or whatever other name you people call him”, it’s different. you people are unbelievable. it’s always been the president who gives the order, and the military executes. now, you say he had nothing to do with it??? smdh.

          • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 7:53 PM -

            Obama didn’t require any praise…He ensured that he credited himself repeatedly for it publicly with his “I” did this and that !

          • Duh November 2, 2012 at 7:42 AM -

            Well didn’t he?

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:08 PM -

            Didn’t he what ? AGREE to the Intel from his MILITARY ADVISORS (not his superior intellect nor his administration) to take Bin Laden out?. Yes he did…..and that’s it ! And you credit him with Bin Laden being taken out ??? Seal Team Six would find some difficulty with that…but just keep buying the media BS as gospel, which makes you like too many “sheeple” who drink the Obama Kool Aid..

          • JR November 15, 2012 at 1:54 AM -

            Can’t you just roll over and die old man? Have a stroke get some cancer jump in front of a train nobody cares about your stupid opinions based on petty delusions and made up rumors.

          • Senior8 November 15, 2012 at 5:17 PM -

            @JR I’ll tell you what sonny…If you said that in person to me,you’d be needing some medical attention to your face ! “Alligator mouth and hummingbird ass” there are too many of you around spouting your BS when you don’t agree with some one else.!Why don’t you just go play with the kids your own age and leave this discussion to adults.?

          • Chu Hyon November 2, 2012 at 11:17 AM -

            Jessica you must remember this.

            Nancy Pelosi, press
            conference, September 7, 2006:

            Even if [Osama bin Laden] is caught tomorrow, it is five years too late. He has done more damage the longer he has been out there. But, in fact, the damage that he has done . . . is done. And even to capture him now I don’t think makes us any safer.

            After ST6 dispatched OBL Nancy Pelosi said this:

            The death of Osama bin Laden marks the most significant development in our fight against al-Qaida. . . . I salute President Obama, his national security team, Director Panetta, our men and women in the intelligence community and military, and other nations who supported this effort for their leadership in achieving this major accomplishment. The death of Osama bin Laden is historic.

          • StanO360 November 2, 2012 at 4:34 PM -

            Thanks for pointing out their hypocrisy. Don’t forget that the circumstances and operators that did the job should never have been revealed. But Obama somehow wanted to use them the associate himself with real men.

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:09 PM -

            But not down to Obama !.The intel on Bin Laden was going on before Obama even thought of applying for the Presidency !

          • StanO360 November 2, 2012 at 4:30 PM -

            Nonsense, Presidents in the past have not taken credit for things like this. This is unprecedented and un-Presidential

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:01 PM -

            Bin Laden was in the US sights long before Obama even thought of the Presidency! He was a community organizer in Chicago at the time,so please credit Seal Team Six with killing Bin Laden instead of the “Imposter-in-Chief”,although he credits himself !

          • Senior8 November 15, 2012 at 5:21 PM -

            The praise belongs to the Navy Seals …so stop the BS ……Obama is already impressed about his role (signature) and taking the praise for it,so just drop it. and move on…….

          • Jessica Lucinda Williams November 15, 2012 at 7:59 PM -

            the “praise” has ALWAYS gone to the servicemember for the execution, and credit to the CINC. it’s not BS. it’s only that because you hate the president. you move on.

      • AKdoc October 13, 2012 at 5:02 AM - Reply

        I suggest that you do further research into this operation…you will find that when BHO was informed that BinLaden had been found he did not immediately say ‘take him out’, no he said, “I need to sleep on this”; the Seal Team was frustrated by his inability to make a decision and say ‘go’.
        Remember please that as an Illinois state senator he was present for 126 votes on various bills, he voted ‘ay or nay’ only four times’ and ‘present’ 122 times…sounds like a man who has trouble making decisions.

        I also recommend that you read the April 30, 2012 Wall Street Journal piece by the US Attorney General, Michael Mukasey, entitled ‘Obama and Bin Laden Bragging Right’s. You will read that BHO played CYA to the point where he positioned himself with a responsibility escape clause. In a memo from then CIA director Leon Panetta where-in the president authorized the operation is this escape clause, “The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRavens hands”. Which is to say, if the operation went wrong, the fault would be Admiral McRaven’s and not the presidents.

        Here are the Narcissist-in-chiefs own words in describing his role in this highly dangerous mission being carried out by Seal Team 6:
        “I directed Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority . . . even as I continued our broader effort. . . . Then, after years of painstaking work by my intelligence community I was briefed . . . I met repeatedly with my national security team . . . And finally last week I determined that I had enough intelligence to take action. . . . Today, at my direction . . .”. A person hearing this description might think the man carried out the operation by himself. Yet the sad message is that other presidents (from Abe Lincoln and Dwight D. Eisenhower to George W. Bush) when it came time for them to give their victory speeches you will not find one mention of their role; all credit was given to the soldiers who actually caused the victory.
        Just thought you might be interested or at least hope you will be interested enough to research the issue.

        • Terry Gingo McClinton October 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM - Reply


        • Rooney November 1, 2012 at 10:12 PM - Reply

          Are you angry over the decision or the fact that he uses “I” too much? And by the way…

          ‘”The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral
          McRavens hands”. Which is to say, if the operation went wrong, the
          fault would be Admiral McRaven’s and not the presidents.’

          Actually, the statement isn’t meant to say anything other than what it explicitly says. Has any president given an order for military action and not left the actual strategic operation to our military commanders? If so, enlighten us.

          Only in a world where we celebrate our own uncompromising and irrational disdain for the opposition do we interpret commonplace statements as “escape clauses.”

        • Duh November 2, 2012 at 7:43 AM - Reply

          Sounds like you are friends with seal team 6….are they tall and research does not mean taking every anti obama thing you read on the internet as fact…thats called being an idiot.

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:19 PM -

            “Duh” appropriate name….I have some Seal friends that I’d like you to meet. “Alligator mouth and Hummingbird ass” comes to mind. when I read your remarks.. And which Branch of the Armed Forces did you serve in???…. No need to answer the question….I already know the answer…
            USN (Ret)

          • AKdoc November 5, 2012 at 1:50 AM -

            Dear Duh:
            Your mother named you well…I suggest that before you start making generalized comments about my thoughts you might want to research them to verify they indeed faulty, however, you find that I research my writings prior to penning them, yet, I am always ready to accept constructive corrections which I find to be a good learning tool.

            I should have asked up front, just which of my “anti-Obma things” are you referring to?

        • Patrick Gerace November 2, 2012 at 11:23 AM - Reply

          What a crock of ignorance you spew! The Top Brass -especially the Commander-In-Chief- make the decisions. Name ONE soldier under Generals Washington, Lee, Grant, Patton, or Hannibal, Napoleon, any leader. Seal Team Six doesn’t wipe their noses unless the President says to!

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:14 PM -

            @Patrick…. Obviously you have never served have you ? It is very obvious you have never been in uniform (of any country). Take that remark from a 30 years USN Veteran (ret).Try your BS on the uninformed public,but not people who have been there in the military….

          • Truth November 3, 2012 at 1:22 AM -

            I served in two wars, so what in the hell are you talking about?! The potus makes the call, always!!!! You idiot!

          • HD November 3, 2012 at 2:03 AM -

            Thank you, for both your service and response.

          • Senior8 November 3, 2012 at 9:41 AM -

            Two wars eh ? I only served in one(Vietnam), on the US side.

            In your two wars whose side did you serve on ? I suppose you’ve heard of the chain of command and who is at field /command level giving the orders…or maybe you haven’t. I’m surprised you didn’t mention the name of the military outfit (s) you served in…..An oversight on your part maybe…or maybe the fact that it isn’t true ! .

          • Senior8 November 3, 2012 at 9:44 AM -

            Really Patrick ? Any personal military experiences of your own you can use to back up your statements…..assuming you did serve !?

          • AKdoc November 5, 2012 at 12:55 AM -


            Sorry to take so long to reply, I have been out of town…anyway I need to you clarify the ‘ignorance I am spewing’ as my grievance is with the Commander-in-Chief not with his soldiers (as a former military man I know first hand that bitching is part of the life) but a president who has trouble making decisions, especially when he has been talking about hunting Bin Laden since the beginning of his term and who had been continually kept abreast the situation and still has to sleep on it, is a leader who does not inspire my trust.

            You ask that I name one soldier who has the gonads to stand up to his C-I-C &/or Brass for his beliefs: most recently, General Ham of the Africa Corps who was just relieved of duty, by his second in command for his stand on saving the Bengazi Survivors…

          • AKdoc November 5, 2012 at 1:40 AM -


            After signing off from replying to you, I went to my e-mail acct. and found the following article by Maj. General Patrick McBready (US Army, Ret.) dated 4 Nov. ’12, entitled, ‘US General: Obama Paralyzed
            by Fear.

            I found it on the WND website…it is interesting as it gives military background initially and then gets into specifics that support the generals thinking. I hope you take the time to read it…one past and present example he cites as evidence is extremely close to my heart…as a field combat corpsman (medic) with the Marines I know all to well the miracle known as ‘Dust-Off Medical Evac’s” and the countless lives they have saved, the general supports his hypothesis of fear based on BHO’s new Medivac Rules…he then speaks to the Bengazi fiasco.

            Bottom line for me, PG, is my belief that Obama is a ‘Ruler not a Leader’.

      • Terry Gingo McClinton October 13, 2012 at 11:37 AM - Reply

        Can’t you bring up anything else that this punk has approved of in his term of any relevance to our society. Don’t ask, Don’t tell repeal aside? Do you not think that it was kind of fishy that bin Laden was killed within days of the President releasing his much questioned birth certificate? Released 3 years into his term? What else has he done? If you put up an actual list of things achieved against things destroyed…trust me..your column will be embarrassingly lacking….

        • Duh November 2, 2012 at 8:26 AM - Reply

          actually he brought up alot of stuff and pretending like it didnt happen doesnt make it go away he presented bill after bill after bill to the Republicans and you know what they did they said piss off we are going to vote on abortion over and over and over and over and over then we are going to talk about ending planned parent hood because they do abortions. Ok smart guy tell me this when that 16 year old girl gives birth to an unplanned child (that could have been avoided had she had some free condoms) and does not have the means to care for it what would you have her do. Now since im sure that you would end all food assistance we can cross that off. Ok easy right? Get a Job, crap she cant do that either because she cant pay for someone to watch her child because her childcare assistance is Social Welfair. Cant have that taking care of our own crap going on, slash it. Medicaid goes because its a hand out right. Ok so we now have a prostitute mom with a kid that has no vaccines or medical care. And its not just one its happening all over the place. What dont like my story? Try this one 16 year old girl goes to PP askes for condoms uses condom does not get pregnant at 16 goes to school gets good job…you get the picture ending PP because they offer abortion (a legal safe RIGHT) as a last Option is like throwing away a $100 bill because you dont like the color green. The America you are talking about is not a good place it is a place of suffering and pain for millions if you did your research and by research i dont mean what fox news says you would see that chances are the policies Romney is talking about are going to affect you but not in the good way you think it will. He is out for him and his rich buddies he does not give a shit about you and that is a fact. You people talk about small gov right? Ok here is an idea get your gov out of my girl parts…OK? Why women or people making less than 1million a year would vote for this guy is baffling. Fox is not news I’m sorry its not it is propaganda flat out. know how you know? Everything these people talk about is somehow linked to one man and his evil plan. There is no evil plan you idiot take off the tin foil hat and join us here in reality.

          • Matt A. November 2, 2012 at 10:04 AM -

            It’s hard to take this seriously due to all the grammar and spelling “oddities”. But honestly, thinking Republicans want to leave everyone who is living through tough circumstances to fend for themselves or die is fallacious. Maybe a select few radicals, but hating your fellow man and not wanting to help is not a common trend among any American. While I think some aspects of PP are unnecessary or wasteful, some of it is beneficial. Reforming/reorganizing it is much closer to what would actually be done.

            Also, this “war on women” is just ridiculous. “Discrimination” has nothing to do with any political party, and should be eliminated outright. I feel as though some feminists are pushing for more than just equal rights however; similar to how Affirmative Action is “equal” for all races (fyi, it’s not). I am all for equal rights for everyone, but giving certain people privileges just because they are different (except for people with actual conditions that need aid, such as the disabled, elderly, or people with severe mental conditions) is, to borrow a liberal phrase, “a bunch of malarkey”.

            As for jihadist Muslims (not the whole Muslim faith), I think the president is ignorant of the mindset of these people. Appeasement, weakness, non-intervention; none of that will discourage them or make them think “Oh, maybe America’s not so bad after all.” They think of us as the “Great Satan”, whereas Israel is only the “Little Satan”. Israel is closer, and surrounded by Muslim countries that have radical inhabitants, so they see the true face of jihadist terrorists on a daily basis. Hopefully, in the case that President Obama is reelected, he will see them for what the really are thanks to the embassy attack in Libya.

            I don’t think the president is a bad guy, just not a very effective or knowledgeable leader. So if he wants to champion women’s rights, aid for lower-income Americans and the elderly, then do it. Just don’t do it instead of doing the job of the president.

            -this is coming from a young, post-college programmer who is disillusioned with the current president and would like to see better, positive changes. Slow economic growth and more social programs is not really a positive change. I don’t think Obama still has the younger voter demographic in his camp; most people I know (pretty much all independent) are voting Romney; because at least he has his priorities straight.

          • HD November 3, 2012 at 2:10 AM -

            Select few radicals… As in Paul Ryan? The man who would be a heartbeat away from being president? He’s really ramped up his commercials locally to try and protect his congressional seat… I think that’s pretty telling.

          • Jessica Lucinda Williams November 5, 2012 at 6:35 AM -

            they will never get it, unless someone was talking about passing a “castration bill” for dead beat dads. when that penis is threatened, then it’s a problem!

        • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:25 PM - Reply

          Better not say anything bad about the Nobel Prize winner Obama (only six months in office with no accomplishments ) but awarded the “coveted” (no longer !) Nobel Peace award ? You’ll be a racist if you do by those sheeple who are blinded by Obama’s BS !

          • HD November 3, 2012 at 2:07 AM -

            “If you do by…”

            All of your hateful comments just made sense to me. Thanks!

      • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 7:48 PM - Reply

        Obama was a community organizer when the Intel search for Bn Laden was in place as.Clinton had him and let him go in the ’90s !!!…..Navy Seals killed Bin Laden under the order of Obama as required (as he is CIC of the armed forces) by being POTUS. Did he do that on his own knowledge/efforts ? Of course not!,,,that is what military intel is all about, so let’s not .give him the credit for what the military did.!.

        • Duh November 2, 2012 at 8:31 AM - Reply

          Who let you near the tin foil again…that is for cooking not hats.

          • Bob November 2, 2012 at 11:35 AM -

            OK, so it’s ok for the president to claim full responsibility for “getting Bin Laden”, but a business man who actually works his whole life, risks HIS life savings, mortgages HIS house, employs and pays taxes and health benefits for 50 people, and yes, thinks he deserves to takes a profit, if he is lucky… Well.. according to our preident, “he didn’t build that”.. !!!.. An I’m sure you are OK with that… right? You ok with all the obvious outright lies half truths, baseless attacks and contradictions ? Your OK with the Media giving him a free pass on everything.. not accountabiltiy what so ever.. Your OK with him being able to say enything he chosses, facts are completely unneccesary.. why? Becuase no one in the media is bothering to check, and if they do they sure aren’t printing that he is lying.. after all why should a little thing like lying stop the Liberal agenda.. We wouldn’t want to make the american Sheple from their slumber, tey might start asking questions… we can’t have that.. The end always justifies the means in the mind of the liberal. No questions allowed, unless your a supporter, and the answer will help to proagate the lies as fact… . I wonder, do you listen to or read anything other than the MSM news? Have you ever taken the time to actually check to see if the words that come out of the presidents mouth are true? We have a narcisistic presedent who loves to talk about all he has done, even though the evidence doesn’t support his claims, attacks and broad brushes everyone that disagrees with him as ignorant or stupid or a hater or racist, yet he claims he is not devicive.. Racial tentions are worse now than at any point I can remember because he and his adminstration are the first to play the race card.. He is also the first to defend the radical inslamists when they commited an act of WAR buy attacking US Embassy… Is was, afterall, justified for these poeple to murder US citizend because some ignorant american made a mean spirited film about Mohammed.. Oh my…! We just must not tolerate that.. So insead of going after the murderers, we go after the american who was exercising his right to free speach. Seriously? And you are OK with all this… right? So, if all this is OK with you, where do we go from here?

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 8:04 PM -

            For your clarification “Duh” POTUS is an abbreviation for President of the Unites States..You’ve learned something today ….no need to thank me for enlightening you …

      • Ley November 2, 2012 at 11:28 AM - Reply

        Al Qaeda is more powerful since Bin Laden was killed..The Mid East is calling for a Caliphate to promote Sharia Law..their goal is to destroy Israel and Western Civilization..That is their agenda in their own words..The truth is Obama is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood financially with our hard earned tax dollars..He is helping them to destroy our Constitution and replace it with Sharia Law..The Project is the MB’s goal..19 Congressmen and women have demanded they release The Project files to the public..a year goes by and they have ignored it..Just like he did with Benghazi..

      • StanO360 November 2, 2012 at 4:32 PM - Reply

        Nonsense TJ, the better question is what President would not have done it? But when a difficult decision came along, like sending troops into a difficult situation (physically, politically and geo-politically), he disappears and sides with fear and apparent cowardice.

  176. RonG October 12, 2012 at 11:32 AM - Reply

    This article cost you one viewer. Such a stupidly inconsiderate bit of spewing party line hatred. This isn’t reporting or editorial it is mindless, led by the nose, party politics, ‘BYE.

    • Valsopinion October 12, 2012 at 2:10 PM - Reply


  177. objective October 12, 2012 at 11:24 AM - Reply

    winged pegasus, and the likes: you people are messed in the head.

  178. objective October 12, 2012 at 11:23 AM - Reply

    the writer is clearly republican. These are such bogus articles when the writer is so slanted in his own brainwash. Can’t people review the facts without the dogma?

  179. Ryan Willard Mcdooger October 12, 2012 at 11:18 AM - Reply

    If you are going to write a painfully one-sided article about our nation’s president, at least take the time to spell-check. Pathetic.

  180. Dems live in reality October 12, 2012 at 10:52 AM - Reply

    The only reason Romney has a shot is all the brainwashing of Americans. You have to be a dumb moron to support today’s Republicans. There is no talking to you, you are to stupid to process facts.

  181. Lester Peoples October 12, 2012 at 10:42 AM - Reply

    Abu Basama why dont you stick your empty head in a Koran and slam it and see if you can get any ‘profit’ from it’ if you aren’t predigise

  182. F. Snicket October 12, 2012 at 9:47 AM - Reply

    I vote Chuck Norris.

    NORRIS 2012!!!!!

    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:30 PM - Reply

      Please write that in, that would be wonderful!

  183. George Renfro October 12, 2012 at 9:45 AM - Reply

    Good article, the author gets O just about right. I had exactly those thoughts when I watched the debate, that O just is too, too, special to have to be at some stupid debate. He is also too lazy to put out any effort or bear any discomfort. O is also a crybaby.

    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:31 PM - Reply

      He was too passive yes, but the lies from his opponent should be the focus.

      • Arany October 12, 2012 at 7:02 PM - Reply

        Why did not His Resentful and Lazy Majesty come out of his insulated bubble universe to attack and demolish any lies you claim his opponent told???

      • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:23 PM - Reply

        He was TOO LOST because he had to be “Live” and didn’t have his faithful ole teleprompter with him to keep him advised !

  184. Abu Basama October 12, 2012 at 9:28 AM - Reply

    Ha ha what a load of biased crap. Politics in america is more of a joke than in England. Most of these people commenting don’t base their comments on political sense but rather they predetermine thier candidate before the argument has started. Politics isn’t taking a side and sticking to it through thick and thin, Thats sports!!

    Obama isn’t the best, Romney will be worse! So to all you Die hard republicans! Sports are more fitting a hobby than politics. If you want to support one team whether right or wrong.

    To my republican “friends” The last guy you put in power was Bush!!! Can you not see how hypocritical it is to judge Obama so harshly so soon after he took power from your candidate!! He couldn’t run a shop let alone the USA.

    Republicans you do not have any grounds to judge Obama harshly even though he is crap. As a Brit I have more right given the idiots you’ve voted in so recently.

    ha ha dont bother replying beacuse I won’t read it. I know i’m right.

    • The Man October 12, 2012 at 12:09 PM - Reply

      OK Obama, I mean Abu hole

    • WingedPegasus October 12, 2012 at 1:50 PM - Reply

      Mohammad was a homosexual psychopath. And you’re the proof. Now put a Guy Fawkes mask on, strap on a backpack filled with nitro, and go meet your seventy virgins because the way you sound, you’re certainly not getting any action down here.

      • Imus DeAnon October 13, 2012 at 1:05 AM - Reply

        Entertaining. We must say. So easily swayed by this..what do you call it..propaganda. Despite you’re racist, ignorant, typical vomit spilled onto a keyboard,it is entertaining. We would like to thank you for further representing all that is wrong… The presidents, red and blue..but mostly you, yourselves. Expect us.

  185. Gamera October 12, 2012 at 8:39 AM - Reply

    Romney is everything Obama hates – a white, successful, business man who loves America.

    • Abu Basama October 12, 2012 at 9:28 AM - Reply

      Obama is half white u idiot. Stop bringing race into it

      • Abu Basama October 12, 2012 at 11:27 AM - Reply

        Lol what is there to dislike about the truth. 8 dislikes to the comment. He is half white, he is a harvard professor. He is not jealous of Romney because he is not a child. Grow up and leave race out of this.

        • damion October 12, 2012 at 1:49 PM - Reply

          Why does he act like a child?

          • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:21 PM -

            The only child like activity i see are grown adults believing stories that i stopped thinking were relevant as an adolescent boy. Ayn Rand is Paul Ryan’s hero, kind of child like if you ask me. #AtlasShrugged

        • CoffeeNerves October 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM - Reply

          You have swallowed the HYPE. Comrade Obozo is not and never was a “Harvard Professor!” The “Professor” title was fabricated from Chicago College where his job title was a “visiting lecturer.”
          This CLOWN is so finished. One and done and good riddance!
          Romney/Ryan for America!

          • Anon A. Mouse October 12, 2012 at 5:21 PM -

            It’s true Obama was not a professor at Harvard. However, the title wasn’t just made up, he taught at the University of Chicago for several years.

          • DianaPawelski October 12, 2012 at 7:14 PM -

            Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor,” most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when he said, “I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution.” A spokesman for the Republican National Committee immediately took exception to Obama’s remarks, pointing out that Obama’s title at the University of Chicago was “senior lecturer” and not “professor.”

          • mike hunt October 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM -

            and he surely has upheld the constitution by destroying and tearing it to shreds.

          • Terry Gingo McClinton October 13, 2012 at 11:47 AM -

            respect the constistution…starting when Mr. Soetoro???

          • Jessica Lucinda Williams October 13, 2012 at 10:52 AM -

            he was president of the Harvard Law Review.

          • Florida Girl October 14, 2012 at 12:53 AM -

            All it takes is money and someone still un-named poured money into this imposter.

          • mike hunt October 13, 2012 at 11:10 AM -

            taught what? how to be a racist bafoon?

          • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 7:34 PM -

            You mean the Chicago Community Center don’t you ?

          • anafreeka October 12, 2012 at 5:46 PM -

            Another nutcase Republican…

          • Arany October 12, 2012 at 7:09 PM -

            Why a nutcase? It is true that he was a lecturer, and it is also true that his classes had very low attendance, and his students did not give him any recommendations.

          • Bo Tse Huang October 12, 2012 at 8:19 PM -

            sos , it is about freedom
            我被不明人士24小時,監視,騷擾,恐嚇,跟蹤,辱罵,在房間做舍麼,上舍麼網,他們都知道,從99年4月底到現在,房間不知從那傳來罵人和敲擊的聲音,跟人講電話時手機還傳來罵人的聲音,我的門號跟無線網路都是遠傳的,上班的時候也是,騎車時也跟著罵,我在東京都的駐點俠隱社區當夜班保全,另一個保全是趙忠賢,還會讀心術,我心理想舍麼他們都知道,有人證,也可以測謊,有不少住戶知道,他們一直想整死我,之前住在臺灣新竹縣湖口鄉信勢村龍安街40號b11室跟b13室,目前住新竹縣湖口鄉明德街冠湖大樓60-9號3樓 ,電話0976063802,名字是黃伯策,還有很多沒講,事情是我在大陸時開始的,二個,但我在台灣時已經被他們盯上了,我姑姑,爸爸,二哥,奶奶都知道
            一直用奇怪的聲音干擾我和我周圍人的神經.我身上有錄到一些證據.車號751bsk L2j212 5436vz可能是 讀心術是完全一字不漏把我腦中所想講出來 另外還有很多沒講的 我有上傳一些影片到youtube 我的頻道上 我可能會失蹤 被逼瘋 逼死 意外身亡 我身體本來就差 他們會找很多方法弄死我又能讓其他人以為跟他們沒關桸 或找不知道的人弄死我 期間我聽到有住戶說財團 說要整死我 說oo人都這樣 說我是oo黨 說你們這些oo人 說性oo的都這樣 我如果一段時間沒有留言或寄郵件 表示我已被逼自殺 遇害或失蹤 發瘋 因為身體本來就差 目前我的facebook and yahoo 沒辦法留言和貼文
            I is unknown people 24 hours, monitored, harassment, intimidation, track, insults, in room do homes what, Shang homes what network, they are know, from April 99 end of to now, room not know from that came curse and percussion of sound, with people told phone Shi phone also came curse of sound, I of door, with wireless network are is far pass of, work of when is, bike Shi also followed scolded, I in Tokyo of resident points Grand implicit community Dang night preservation, another preservation is officials, also will read indicates, I heart ideal homes what they are know, Was card, also can measuring lie, has many households know, they has been wanted to whole died I, zhiqian live in Taiwan Hsinchu County Hukou Township letter potential village long street 40th, B11 room with B13 room, currently live Hsinchu County Hukou Township out de Street Crown Lake building 60-9, 3 building, phone 0976063802, name is he rummages about in strategy, also has many didn’t told, things is I in continent Shi began of, II a, but I in Taiwan Shi has is they at Shang has, I aunt, Dad, II brother, Grandma are knowHas been with strange of sound interference I and I around people of neural. I who has recorded to some evidence. car, 751bsk L2j212 5436vz may is read indicates is full a words not leak to I brain in the by wanted to told out also also has many didn’t told of I has upload some movie to YouTube I of channel Shang I may will missing is forced mad forced died accident died I body originally on poor they will found many method kills I also can let other people thought with they didn’t closed XI or found not know of people kills I I heard residents said the Consortium said to me that say I OO OO people party said you OO OO so I said that if people did not leave a message or send a message that for some time I had been forced to commit suicide were killed or missing and crazy because of the already poor health I Facebook and Yahoo can’t message and paste the text

          • MarMar October 13, 2012 at 3:37 AM -

            I wonder what most of Romney’s past employees would say about him.. and I’m talking about the minimum wage folks who lost their jobs once he bankrupted their company.

          • Florida Girl October 14, 2012 at 12:59 AM -

            His students should have told the people of the United States this – screamed it from the roof tops. Shame on them. I saw through him and did not vote for him first time round. I have now changed political parties because of his dismal failure as Commander in Chief.

          • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 7:38 PM -

            “You can fool some of the people all of the time,all of the people some of the time,but you can’t fool ALL of the people ALL of the time” ! Obama and his band o incompetents will discover this in a few weeks time if the US is going to survive !

          • Stephen Cothren October 12, 2012 at 11:18 PM -

            Better a republican than a loser dem or libtard

          • Florida Girl October 14, 2012 at 12:56 AM -

            No real argument so you go back to name calling. Pitiful argument. We should then reply Idiot Wrapped in a Moron Democrat? Makes as much sense as your statement about Republicans. Try getting some intelligence into the conversation, please. Name calling, like cussing, indicates a lack of vocabulary.

        • mike hunt October 13, 2012 at 11:08 AM - Reply


        • Florida Girl October 14, 2012 at 12:50 AM - Reply

          He may be a Harvard professor, but he acts childish. How do you know he is not jealous of Romney? He acts like he dislikes white people and the minister he had for 20 years preached racism and hate for whites. Even said “Gxd Dxxn the United States of America”. It would be easier to leave race out of this if Obama would. We are all grown up here but not every one acts like it, including our petulent president.

      • DianaPawelski October 12, 2012 at 6:47 PM - Reply

        You are so right. BO is a MULATTO. He is not black just because he doesn’t embrace his mother’s side. He will always be a Mulatto. RACE HAS NOTHING TO DO with us not liking BO. SAD that a lot of these people don’t KNOW WHAT THE WORD RACIST MEANS. Before they start calling us racist they need to look the word up.

        • Blimp Rushmore October 12, 2012 at 9:08 PM - Reply

          Whites elected him. and whites will fire him.

          • Stephen Cothren October 12, 2012 at 11:16 PM -

            Yes we will….the Muslim traitor

          • Florida Girl October 14, 2012 at 12:23 AM -

            According to the public records, blacks turned out in record numbers to vote for Obama. Many whites fell for his “apple pie in the sky, by and by” act, too. Let’s all fire him!

        • MarMar October 13, 2012 at 3:34 AM - Reply

          mulatto is considered a racist word…

          • Florida Cracker October 14, 2012 at 12:43 AM -

            No, it is not. It is merely a definition:
            A person having one white and one Black
            parent. A person of mixed white and Black ancestry. Check your dictionary.

          • MarMar December 14, 2012 at 12:16 AM -

            negro is in the dictionary. Doesn’t mean it’s not offensive to most people.

          • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 7:33 PM -

            Is stupid a racist word as well ?? If so……we’re all in deep trouble !!

        • Linda Dunaway Taylor October 13, 2012 at 6:02 PM - Reply

          Actually, Diana, he is 50% white 43% Arab and only 6.something percent black. He is not a Mulatto.

          • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 7:32 PM -

            We will never know if the futile efforts of trying to get his true credentials of his background/history are any indication !

      • Florida Girl October 14, 2012 at 12:20 AM - Reply

        Didn’t you hear the speech to a black audience where he told them that the black people in New Orleans affected by Hurricane Katrina were not well taken care of because they were black? Obama himself brings race into it when it suits his purpose, which is quite often.

    • L October 12, 2012 at 5:42 PM - Reply

      Seriously dude, look at your comment. It’s always race isn’t it. Vote it down idiots I don’t care. Your opinons are irrelevant. 311 million people live here. 50 likes to your comment is miniscule.

      • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 7:28 PM - Reply

        So we have 311 million people on this forum ?!! Wow !!!

    • DianaPawelski October 12, 2012 at 6:53 PM - Reply

      There was NOTHING RACIST in your comment. People need to look the word RACIST up before they start calling names. WOW, I wish they would grow up and act like adults instead of spoiled brats when they don’t get their way or don’t like what you said they start name calling.

      • Beverly Wantanabe October 12, 2012 at 8:42 PM - Reply

        In the last election, 95% of blacks voted for Obama and 47% of whites voted for McCain. Had 95% of the whites voted for McCain, we’d have heard that he was elected by “white racists”.

        So we can truly say Obama was elected by black racists.

        • waraji October 13, 2012 at 6:00 AM - Reply

          What you just said is inconsistent.

          So, “Had 95% of the whites voted for McCain…”, it would be wrong to call them “white racists” ? I agree with you.

          But then it is also wrong to call the 95% of blacks voting for Obama racist.

          • Terry Gingo McClinton October 13, 2012 at 11:45 AM -


          • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 7:26 PM -

            I think the “racist” term resulted from the past history of whites (majority) being called racists by blacks(minority) I don’t recall whites using the term racist when applying to blacks..

    • Terry Gingo McClinton October 13, 2012 at 11:45 AM - Reply

      @Gamera…you have no idea how truly relevant this statement is I am afraid. He screams about the 1% yet go and research his tax forms on his website. How did he become a multi-millioinaire in office? How were he and his wife capable of making well over 200k a year while she “worked” in a law office and he “worked” with the community teaching them how to register to vote(Acorn)?? A millionaire teaching you the horrible ways of a millionaire? REALLY! Read your history fools…The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx would be a good start or any historical data on the rhetoric of Hitler..sounds a whole lot like the BS our Democratic party “teaches” today…

    • Slaphappy Whappyjappy October 13, 2012 at 9:52 PM - Reply

      You said it Gamera.

  186. WingedPegasus October 12, 2012 at 8:09 AM - Reply

    Not much to add here, the author of the article has delved into the disturbing psychology of Obama’s narcissistic delusion of kingship and infallibility. A trademark of all socialist/communist tyrannical want to be despots. Americans should be very afraid when this empty suit sitting in an empty chair trucks with foreign leaders who want to kill us. If what we all saw behind the podium last week is any indication of how he acts around global heads of state and terrorist leaders then we’ve been in trouble for a very long time. And the media need pay a price for the cover up as well!

    • Abu Basama October 12, 2012 at 9:29 AM - Reply

      Be quiet too you

      • WingedPegasus October 12, 2012 at 1:52 PM - Reply


        • SpeakOfTheTruth October 12, 2012 at 7:42 PM - Reply

          You sir, are the idiom. 🙂

      • Florida Cracker October 14, 2012 at 12:11 AM - Reply

        To whom do you mean “be quiet to you”?

    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:24 PM - Reply

      Yup, those terrorist leaders aren’t scared of Obama at all. Just ask Bin Laden or those Somali Pirates…

      And he’s such a tyrannical leader the way he wasn’t able to get anything past the obstructionist Republican controlled house, what a despot!

      • WingedPegasus October 12, 2012 at 2:40 PM - Reply

        Somali pirates are still in action (try and keep up with current events), Obama is the beneficiary of years of work prior to him coming to office in hunting down Osama. In fact, Obama is on record for wanting to let Gitmo detainees go and to stop the interrogation practices which lead to the info necessary to get Osama. And since you’re so tardy in your knowledge of current events, Al Qaeda is moving into all areas of the Middle East, Pakistan, and Afghanistan and guess what, Obama is funding them through his Egyptian buddies in the Muslim Brotherhood. So, no, they’re not scared. They are sending people here to vote for the dictator in chief so that they’ll have more time to complete the destruction of Israel and then go after you and then us.
        Oh, Republicans in the ONE house of our system is meaningless because the dictator uses his pen to sign executive orders to get his way and orders his various unelected departments to set up rules and regulations which the rest of us must live under regardless of how we voted. —Tyranny!

        • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:53 PM - Reply

          Except the Somali pirates that captured a pirate captain and then were killed by Navy Seals. America shouldn’t be fixing the world’s problems, but when people attack us or our people we should take them down. This President has done that.

          Enhanced Interrogation techniques did not lead to the killing of bin Laden, try to keep up with current events and analysis.

          The Muslim Brotherhood is being funded? Don’t you mean the Egyptian Government. You don’t even know what that aide goes towards. In your little warped sense of reality you see Obama handing a Muslim a gun, and that Muslim handing it to al qaeda. That’s just incorrect.

          Executive orders don’t take the place of real legislation, such as the American Jobs Act. And what specific executive orders represent tyranny. The one exempting religious institutions from covering contraceptives? Should that one go? How about orders related to Human Trafficking? How about Gulf Coast restoration? Hey if congress isn’t willing to act because they’ve taken a do nothing get Obama out approach, then i approve of whatever methods available to get something done.

          • WingedPegasus October 12, 2012 at 3:23 PM -

            ….Really, ask the parents of the U.S. soldiers killed by Afghan police and army regulars if anyone is paying the price. I’m sure Ambassador Stevens and the three other heroes who died with him would disagree with your assessment. And since you are behind in your current events, you should know that the current president of Egypt is the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and that the Egyptian parliament has elected a MAJORITY Muslim Brotherhood membership so, the Egyptian Government and the Muslim brotherhood are now ONE IN THE SAME. Oh, and just today the Egyptian Government (Muslim brotherhood) has called for jihad against Jerusalem. Obama’s Arab Spring is becoming a Arab Halloween nightmare. So you catch up now.
            And, if you don’t think that closing down oil production in the gulf,closing coal mines in Pa., W.Va., and Ohio without congressional oversight isn’t one man rule than I have a bridge here in Brooklyn to sell you. As far as human trafficking, what are you talking about? Saudi Arabia, North Africa, Mexico, Russia, what? Contraception? we didn’t need an executive order about that until your buddy tried to issue a REGULATION (not a bill or a law) through HHS to force religious organizations to hand out the crap.
            Finally, the last sentance in your post is a final indictment and proof of your Alinskyite, Marxist, Dictatorial proclivities. You’d go along with anything regardless of the methods to get whatever result that you want even if it involved trashing the rules of a civil society. You prove my opening point when I suggest that we Americans should all be very afraid of YOU.

          • Ron Tuttle November 2, 2012 at 5:48 AM -

            If ever there was justification for contraception you have just won the prize.

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:45 PM -

            @ Ron Tuttle ..I don’t think Obama would like you saying that about him.but I agree ,and I’m sure thousands would agree ! Well stated !

          • WingedPegasus November 5, 2012 at 9:27 AM -

            Typical Obama/Marxist. Alinsky mindless disparagement one liner book in hand ready to attack rather than engage. Pathetic actually.

          • Senior8 November 14, 2012 at 10:54 AM -

            tell Obama that to his face please !

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 3:00 AM -

            You *do* realize that they elected their officials in a free and fair democratic process, right? That’s not your problem though. It isn’t about democracy. It’s about control. As long as they elect someone *you* are ok with, then everything is fine.


          • Senior8 November 14, 2012 at 12:58 PM -

            I see that ,even the Liberal media,admitted that Obama won the election mainly due to the Latino and Black vote ….or is that now considered a “racist” remark? If so please get in contact with them because .it was their statements..

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 1:02 PM -

            You can’t answer my questions about Egypt’s democratic process so you have to change the subject? Typical weak argument tactic.

            This “liberal media” you talk about really isn’t so liberal. They’re really just reporting the facts. He did overwhelmingly win the Latino and African-American votes. He also won the youth vote and women’s votes. The only thing he didn’t win was the old white dude vote.

            What was your point again?

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 1:05 PM -

            You certainly have a very interesting perspective on reality. What medication are you on (or should be on but have quit taking) that influences this “hokum seasoned with little fragments of truthiness”?

          • mike hunt October 13, 2012 at 10:45 AM -

            Delusinal Bafoon=YOU

          • Florida Girl October 13, 2012 at 11:43 PM -

            You are just too blind, afraid there’s no hope for you. Even if you take off the blinders and ear plugs, you won’t know what’s going on. So sad, you are the one who appears delusional.

          • Florida Girl October 13, 2012 at 11:46 PM -

            Oops, I ower Mike Hunt an apology. the above comment was meant for that nutty Ted Glass. I humbly apologize for any confusion i created on this site. I just can’t believe Ted is so far off the mark.

          • Terry Gingo McClinton October 13, 2012 at 11:29 AM -

            That’s exactly what Obama is doing every time he & his ADMINISTRATION turns a blind eye..case in point..Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Syria, Iran..although with Libya..for SOME reason, he decided to be proactive at all, which is amazing..without the approval of Congress which is IMPEACHABLE! He and his are the JOKE that just keeps on giving..and we will be laughing and/or crying about it for years and years to come!

          • Florida Girl October 13, 2012 at 11:40 PM -

            Exactly right, Terry. Congress wasn’t even out of session for some of his signing of executive orders – it was the weekend for goodness sake.
            This election is so important, just hope all the Ted’s of the U.S. get lost on election day.

          • noloveinfear November 10, 2012 at 12:40 AM -

            Gadaffhi was going door-to-door executing citizens. We had the option of doing the politically correct thing – enforcing the no-fly zone – or doing the humane thing – hunting down a dictator hell-bent on genocide.

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 3:01 AM -

            The President doesn’t need Congressional approval to *initiate* a strike. He only has to get approval within 30 days of the start of the strike or call it off before then. You *really* need to figure out how things work in this country.

          • dyingspirit October 13, 2012 at 7:19 PM -

            Please remove your blinders and ear plugs!

          • Florida Cracker October 13, 2012 at 11:37 PM -

            Ted, Ted, Ted…You are so far out, you’re in. I really feel for you because you are so misinformed and spout off so profusely, you really make yourself look foolish. Do your homework, and then get back to us.

          • isohappynoww November 1, 2012 at 5:18 PM -

            Go, Ted! Glad you have the courage to tell the truth on this site.

          • aph10 November 4, 2012 at 2:42 AM -

            Your opinions are the very few fact based, sane ones here.

        • Briant1 October 13, 2012 at 2:33 PM - Reply

          Sorry Ted, unless Obama kills EVERY pirate, or EVERY terrorist, he is a complete failure. Unlike President Bush, who simply had to pass the vague “he’s kept us safe” test.

          • WingedPegasus October 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM -

            Unlike your friend in the white house, my political philosophy is to capture and convict in a court of law. Obama although he railed against “waterboarding” to get relevant intel has no problem just killing terrorist rather than capturing, getting info, and then trying them in a military tribunal. This president has killed more foreign citizens through surgical strikes than any president in U.S. history. In fact, the cold blooded tendencies and seeming celebratory atmosphere which surrounds the killings is unique in an American president and frankly, lends to the conclusion that we are dealing with a darkly sick administration reminiscent of Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. So, stop obsessing over Bush, it’s 2012 not 2008.
            Please tell me that you’re not going to vote more than twice this November or how about this, why not stay home because you are just not informed enough to vote at all. You dilute the vote of all of us who actually know that there is trouble within our nation.

          • Briant1 October 14, 2012 at 5:54 PM -

            You really turned me around on this whole thing. I hope to someday be as “informed” as all you guys. It’s truly amazing that you can ascertain my level of voter information from a 2 sentence post. Personally I’d bet I’m as informed if not more so than you guys, but since I probably don’t vote the way you guys do, I’m assuming that automatically means I’m an idiot by default. In your world.

            You guys keep knocking things around your echo chamber, reinforcing each others opinion that you are making America a better place, and the rest of us will somehow try to muddle through, lacking your keen intellect and superior wit.

            Oh, and I’ll knock off the comparisons to Bush. I realize it’s been 4 years, and frankly I’m embarrassed. The Right never mentioned Bill Clinton after 2000, so I guess I’ll just follow their shining example.

          • AllPegasiAreWinged November 7, 2012 at 2:05 AM -

            First, learn how to speak English. Second, you sound like a mental patient. Mao? Stalin? C’mon. Get your feet back in reality.

          • Katie November 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM -

            Hitler’s campaign slogan was “Forward.” Get it?

          • IsGoodwillPossible? November 15, 2012 at 3:46 AM -

            Um, so what? Hitler killed his political opponents in the night of the long knives, encouraged violence against Jews, intellectuals, gypsies, gays and other minorities, created concentration camps killing millions, promoted hatred and went on a bloodthirsty rampage to conquer his neighbors in a feverish attempt to take over the world. Obama seeks consensus, works within the law, and is seeking a stronger social contract that includes everyone doing their share. Your comparison is spurious.

          • Katie November 15, 2012 at 12:02 PM -

            Your statement that Obama works within the law is a laughable, to say the least. He bypasses Congress with his freakin’ “executive orders” and if something “smells,” he invokes “executive privilege.” Social Contract? Fair share, bla bla bla. Life isn’t fair and isn’t meant to be. Get over it.

            INITIALLY, the German people LOVED Hitler. He gave them free stuff. First thing was “healthcare.” Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

            This man is on a mission to destroy our once-great country, and people like you are making it possible. In the meantime, continue believing what you want to believe. But you might want to pay some attention to BENGHAZI.

          • Florida Cracker October 13, 2012 at 11:14 PM -

            Well, it appears that Obama does not call a terriorist a terriorist – he just can’t bring himself to say it. He bows to the King of Saudi Arabia, he states before the United Nations that the name of the prophet should not be blemished, that the call to prayer is the most beautiful sound on earth—face it, he’s a Muslim. He likes the Muslim Brotherhood, he has aided them in coming into power after the start of the Arab Spring movement. Then he acts so surprised and sits with his mouth open when they attack our embasy and kill our Ambassador and others in a cleverly planned attack, the the big O doesn’t get it? or he just plain lied. I favor the second option here. He was taught the Koran when he was a child and knows what happens to anyone not believing it. They are killed, killed, killed. It’s predictable.

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:41 PM -

            “We are not at war with Islam.. we are at war with Al-Qaida ” consistent claim by Obama. Well guess what Odumba…They are Islamic !!

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 2:58 AM -

            It’s irrelevant that they’re Islamic.

            The KKK is Christian. Hitler was Christian, too. Are we at war with Christians then, too?

          • Senior8 November 14, 2012 at 10:51 AM -

            Irrelevant that they are part of the Islamic goal to make the world Islamic ?! I suggest that you read the Qu’ran (as I have) to get an idea of what Islam is all about…

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 12:19 PM -

            I suggest you read the Bible (as you clearly haven’t if you think the Qu’ran is the only “holy” book demanding world domination).

          • Senior8 November 14, 2012 at 12:52 PM -

            Please fill me in on the latest murders,be-headings,,bombings and terrorism that the Bible has “Christians”involved in!. and yes, I have read the Bible, but it very obvious that you haven’t read the Qu’ran whose extremist followers are carrying out the atrocities in the name of Islam. Have you not noticed the deathly silence and lack of Muslims out in the streets protesting about the atrocities carried out in the name of Islam ?. Print a cartoon though……,or say ANYTHING about Mohammed ,and see their reaction. The peaceful ideology(not religion)…Continue to keep your head in the sand and one day you may just have to learn to speak Arabic and adhere to Sharia law…

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 12:59 PM -

            All one has to do is look at Africa to see lots of really bad things being done by Christians in the name of god. That you call it an ideology and not a religion is quite telling. If that were the case, Christianity is only an ideology, too.

          • Senior8 November 14, 2012 at 1:19 PM -

            That’s strange, because I believe Muslims pray to Allah …not Mohammed..Christians pray to God …..and ________?..Fill in the blank please about the Christian “ideology”…..

          • Gleen Scooter October 14, 2012 at 4:11 AM -

            sorry Obama is too busy killig women and children with his drones ,far more the ay terrorists that have been killed ad 1000% more inocets ad American Service people have bee killed uder Obama so suck obamas cox like you are used to doig and shut the he!! up!

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 2:59 AM -

            Less than 2% of those killed in drone strikes were civilians over the past year. Please get yourself some facts.

        • Wrongsitemybad October 13, 2012 at 5:45 PM - Reply

          Al Qaeda is moving into all areas of the Middle East, Pakistan, and Afghanistan and guess what, Obama is funding them through his Egyptian buddies in the Muslim Brotherhood.

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 2:55 AM -

            Prove it.

        • Wrongsitemybad October 13, 2012 at 5:51 PM - Reply

          “Al Qaeda is moving into all areas of the Middle East, Pakistan, and Afghanistan and guess what, Obama is funding them through his Egyptian buddies in the Muslim Brotherhood.”
          This was the moment that I realised you were a nutcase. I guess I’m on the wrong website if 70 people agree with that statement.
          “Oh, Republicans in the ONE house of our system is meaningless” – yes, how dare Obama pass executive orders when he was elected to do so! He was elected to pass legislation. Republicans refuse to let him pass legislation because they’re still back in the 20th century.

          You are aware the rest of the world laughs at your Republican Party right? We turn into FOX News if we want a laugh. I love liberty! But if you guys still think that you have an amazing health care system when it’s one of the worst in the developed countries list, and ignore the social benefits to Obamacare so you can keep labeling him a ‘socialist/communist/dictator/Hitler.’

          He’s not a Muslim. He’s clearly a Christian. He doesn’t support the Muslim Brotherhood. Have you ever considered he’s just a man like anyone else, trying to do the best by his country? If you want to attack his policies, sure, by all means go ahead. You’re entitled to do so. I implore you take part of the political process, you have a right to do so. But when you spread ignorance like this, you make the rest of the world sit back and laugh.


          • Moussi October 13, 2012 at 11:14 PM -

            Guess what… The rest of the world does NOT laugh at the Republican Party. We’re praying they get into Office, for our own sakes, and for the sake of our American friends.

            Obama may be a Christian, though I strongly doubt it, but he’s a man who sat for 20 years listening to
            the sermons of his “CLOSE FRIEND AND MENTOR”, the anti-Semitic, ANTI-WHITE RACIST, Rev. Jeremiah Wright; a man who cursed America. (“God DAMN America”, remember? !)

            And don’t forget Michelle’s comment when Obama was nominated: “this is the first time I’ve felt proud of America.” A wonderful First Lady.

          • Daneen Boccuzzi Tosi October 13, 2012 at 11:24 PM -

            @2d6336dabecaffe1f92f02fd207e0138:disqus Hey, the next time you need emergency brain or heart surgery, you need to go to perhaps he Middle East for your surgery, since our health care system is one of the worst. Oh that’s right you would die waiting in line or they will use equipment from the stoneage. Also you will still love Obama’s social benefits for everyone when YOU will be paying more and more and more and more for the folks that aren’t contributing at all. They don’t need to, you are doing it for them! As long as they keep getting their Iphones and flat screen TV’s they are happy. Oh and keep being enamored with Obama’s foreign policies….He is in bed with lots of dictators and bows to every world leader..that’s a good thing.
            As far as Obama being a Christian, now I am sitting back and laughing @ YOU! You are right, the Lord Jesus Christ surely is for abortion in the 3rd trimester….It’s not a baby, only a blob of tissue~

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:50 PM -

            I don’t understand why anyone would question that Barrack Hussein Obama is not a Christian ..Looks like a typical “Christian” name to me! 🙂

          • Florida Cracker October 13, 2012 at 11:28 PM -

            I first realized you were a nutcase when I started reading your comment, and when you said “he is clearly a Christian”, I realized you are the Mother of all Nut Cases. I laughed out loud at your ignorance. You do know that those of us who see what is going on laugh at people like you who are in the Obama fog? Yes, this is a wrong website for you. The truth is being spread and laugh all you want – the rest of the world does not love Obama as much as you do. When they laugh, it’s because of uninformed people like you. Obama is a muslim, and he is trying his best to dismantle our country. I hope you get your days mixed up and miss election day Nov. 6 or just get lost driving to the polls. You really should do your homework if you’re going to vote. When you spread ignorance like this, you make the rest of the world sit back and laugh–at you.

          • WingedPegasus October 14, 2012 at 1:28 AM -

            U.S aid to Egypt as of 9-14-2012 (3 days after the burning of our flag and the breaching of our embassy wall in Cairo) is 450 million dollars, twice the amount given when Egypt was considered one of our allies. I’ve been to Egypt and I’ve been to Cairo, I’ve had interaction with the people there, how about you? And, if you are calling me a nut case because of my factual representation that the new Egyptian government is now controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood (the parent organization of Al qaeda) then you my friend are the delusional one here. Also, your implication that I’ve suggested that Obama is a Muslim is a typical Alinskyite ploy to lie and change the subject. I haven’t stated that here, but I do know that after Obama received pleas from Egyptian Coptic Christians for help and relief from being murdered and having their churches burned down that Obama decided to increase aid from 250 million to 450 million. Of course in your world, we shouldn’t make much of that, but we can make fun of FOX news (which I rarely watch, my news comes from the Internet ). Also, you have demonstrated your lack of knowledge of how government works when you state that the president “passes executive orders”. That was my point, he doesn’t need to “pass” anything. He signs a “order” and no one has a right to say a thing about it. Well, that may be okay in some parts of the world, but we in America like to have a discussion and have our laws go through a check and balance system. See, we don’t like dictators over here. You mentioned “Hitler”, sounds like a guilty conscience because I certainly didn’t mention him in my post; or, will you say I had regardless? (probably).And finally, you imploring me to take part in the political system. I won my first election in 1981 and went on to win two more after that. It was the people who voted for me not a gang of thugs with batons standing in front of a polling place in South Philly. So you just run along, spread your Guy Fawkes, neo com/socialist brand of anarchy to someone who is dull enough to actually believe in your cynicism.

          • Gleen Scooter October 14, 2012 at 4:15 AM -

            lol this jackass says PEACE but he is a warmonger and a bigot. What does his kind “bigots/demoncraps know about PEACE…maybe how to cut up innocents into little pieces and eat them like Obama does lassie and big bird!!!

          • Big ben October 14, 2012 at 10:46 AM -

            “He’s clearly a Christian.” As Florida Cracker would ask, do you have proof of that? Reverend Wright has a “church” but it’s surely not Christian.

          • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 6:35 PM -

            “We are not at war with Islam, we are at war with Al-Qaeda” Obama parrots after every Muslim attack on innocents…..Guess what “Imposter-in-Chief”…..they are Muslim.! ..

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:48 PM -

            And you are clearly one of the “sheeple” who drank the Kool Aid of Obama…It’s a good thing that you can’t vote in the US election…

        • Florida Cracker October 13, 2012 at 11:07 PM - Reply

          what a good, fact-based answer. Everything Obama has done since he came into office should be thrown out. He doesn’t even qualify for the office he holds.

          • WingedPegasus October 14, 2012 at 1:32 AM -

            Thank you!

          • jones.barry November 1, 2012 at 11:21 PM -

            Obama would fail a standard FBI background check, based on his history of drug abuse

          • Truth November 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM -

            you are racist

          • The Rage November 10, 2012 at 2:37 AM -

            Ignorance is bliss. Please tell me how he passed the TS clearance to hold his current position. That is POTUS.

          • Katie November 15, 2012 at 12:03 PM -

            MONEY can buy you anything, including false ID. Well, you asked!

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 2:55 AM -

            Clearly he passed not only the “standard FBI background check”, but also passed the much more exhaustive background checks (plural) necessary to hold the highest office in the land and the security clearances that come with it. Are you done saying dumb things?

          • Matthew Dell November 2, 2012 at 9:09 AM -

            all the money you earned at your last job should be given back. wtf. you are an idiot sir.

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:36 PM -

            How dare you call Obama an idiot??? But very true !!

        • AKdoc October 19, 2012 at 7:11 AM - Reply

          Intuitive and well written!!!!! First we had to view BHO’s dismal appology tour and then listen to his constant braggadosciuos reminders that he took OBL out all by himself…’I don’t need no stink’in SEALS’…’Look you fools Alcaida is on the run and isn’t a viable organization anymore, so he says’, and yet we see the real truth every day via TV, the middle east is on fire and yet BHO has chosen to sleep with the enemy (the Muslim Brotherhood)…in reality he has made this world a much more dangerous place – just one more thing to thank him for. God help us all!!!!

          • WingedPegasus October 19, 2012 at 3:47 PM -

            Thank you for your kind remarks. Such a pleasure to know that not everyone is in a daze.

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 8:00 PM -

            The people can vote a President in,,and they can vote a President out ! Roll on Nov 6th !

          • The Rage November 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM -

            Maybe after the next four years

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 2:56 AM -

            That explains why Romney was defeated and Obama was re-elected for four more years. How’s that feel?

          • Katie November 14, 2012 at 12:12 PM -

            Just a reminder that the dumbing down of America is working well.

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 12:17 PM -

            Actually, the red states, the ones with the worst education in the union, are the ones that voted overwhelmingly for Romney.

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 1:06 PM -

            There was no “apology tour”. Quit getting your “facts” from the GOP propaganda machine.

        • Abner November 1, 2012 at 10:41 AM - Reply

          Spot on!!

        • Phil Steward November 2, 2012 at 5:07 AM - Reply

          Exactly. When you *openly* oppose the very techniques(waterboarding Khalid Sheihk Mo-achmed) that revealed the courier who outed Bin Laden, *as* they are being employed….& then take credit for a delayed decision that city councilman could have easily made….what does that make you?

          It’s as if he was riding a white stallion holding a sword, dueling Osama while shouting out cliche’s “your days of vileness are over, terrorist fiend!”

          No to the President, what happened there is entirely political. I doubt he as man, really gives a damn about radical Islam & not only that…all his policies have done is encourage it.

        • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 2:54 AM - Reply

          Um, except that nothing learned under the duress of torture *actually* lead to Bin Laden. If you disagree, please be prepared to list the specific facts learned, who they were learned from, and when.

          • Senior8 November 14, 2012 at 1:03 PM -

            Obviously you have all the expert knowledge/answers on this subject. What media source are you using to justify YOUR statements please ?

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 1:08 PM -

            The burden of proof isn’t on me. It’s on WingedPegasus for this statement:

            “Obama is the beneficiary of years of work prior to him coming to office in hunting down Osama. In fact, Obama is on record for wanting to let Gitmo detainees go and to stop the interrogation practices which lead to the info necessary to get Osama”

            You’re not actually interested in the facts. You’re just hoping I’ll be foolish enough to let you derail this conversation by talking about whether the sources of my info are part of a “liberal media” or “in the bag for Obama”, etc. Nice try, troll.

          • Senior8 November 14, 2012 at 1:15 PM -

            I think I hear your mommy calling you to come in from playing with the big kids..

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 1:21 PM -

            Nice try, troll.

      • Ethel Weiss October 12, 2012 at 3:21 PM - Reply

        Nor pasr the Demonrat House and Senate for 2 years other than the ACA which will be radically changed in Jan. due to popular demand. Four wasted years and trillions of wasted dollars.

        • Robert Illes October 12, 2012 at 7:27 PM - Reply

          The “Two Years of Democratic Congress” which supposedly means just SO much could be done is just another lame right wing talking point. First the Democrats also included (and still do) conservative obstructionists such as Ben Nelson, Bill Nelson, Mary Landrieu, Blanche Lincoln, Joe Lieberman, Max Baucus, etc. They are why we lost the “public option” in health care. Second, Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd were ill most of the time (i.e., till January 2011). Third Al Franken’s election was held up by bogus recounts before he could be seated as #60. There was only a brief window when there were 60 Democrat Senators, but still subject to the filibuster. They did manage to pass the ACA, thank God. And then, Kennedy died and the great Scott Brown was elected, and Byrd was replaced by a similarly right wing Democrat in West Virginia. And the rest of the time, true to this day, the Republicans followed Mitch McConnell’s dictum to block EVERYTHING Obama advanced because their STATED primary purpose was not jobs, energy, infrastructure, education, housing, relief or anything else positive for the American people, but rather, “making sure Obama is a one term President”. That unpatriotic, treacherous “strategy” was determined at a meeting of Rethugs on January 20, 2009 – not a rumor, fact copped to by Newt Gingrich, right wing hero.

          • mike hunt October 13, 2012 at 10:51 AM -

            Another BAFOON are you!!!!!!!!!!!

          • Mojo the Awkward October 13, 2012 at 10:56 AM -

            I love the way you guys talk about Scott Brown’s election, in MASSACHUSETTS, in the ‘KENNEDY SEAT,’ as if it was just a random weather event. It was a DAMNING indictment of the profound FAILURE of the modern Democratic Party to listen to voters, to be accountable, to work with the other members of Congress to accomplish durable legislation, to GOVERN.
            After the 2010 midterms, Obama admitted his party had gotten a ‘shellacking.’ What lessons did he learn? Apparently, only that if people think they have an alternative they’ll vote for it – which is why he’s spent the last two years trying to convince voters they don’t have an alternative. The man is the most profoundly anti-democratic leader this country has ever seen. Huey Long could give him lessons in humility; Malcolm X in civility. Except, of course, Obama can’t take lessons from anyone. He’s a lecturer, not a listener.

          • Florida Cracker October 13, 2012 at 11:57 PM -

            Yes, he’s a lecturer and he does not like it when someone disagrees or opposes him. Just think about his facial expressions the night of the Presidential Debate. Can’t wait for the next temper tantrum, he can’t take someone standing up to him and having the gall to disagree with him.

          • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 7:06 PM -

            Talk about facial expressions !?…How about the laughing,sneering,, condescending,eye rolling ,gaffe prone liability Biden ?!..I thought I was watching Edgar Bergen’s dummy Charley MCarthy…Democrats still insist that Biden won the debate with Ryan ,who outclassed Biden without even opening his mouth. ! Seeing first hand is believing. and did the public see that on two nights. !…

          • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 6:49 PM -

            He’s is only a listener (but doesn’t hear) when he hasn’t rehearsed and hasn’t his trusty teleprompter with him !.It was such a pleasure and confirmation on the debate with Romney when Obama had the look of a deer caught in the headlights at night,but still the Dem “lemmings” will blindly follow !

          • JoeBatters October 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM -

            @Robertilkes … I suggest you use these exact same talking points as a radical islamist has a knife to your throat on some future flight. Im sure he will be as convinced as the rest of us are of your apologies for an empty suit of a president. (small ‘p’ intended) that you supported in 2008.

          • Florida Cracker October 14, 2012 at 12:00 AM -

            In a way, that is what is so sad about it. These staunch Obama supporters just don’t know what radical islamists want to do to all non-believers. They will find out the hard way that their goal is to take over control of the world and they are taught from childhood to hate and kill.

          • serfdumb November 1, 2012 at 1:17 PM -

            Because you know so many muslims?

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:54 PM -

            Read the Qu’ran…..I have. and .it will remove all doubt !

          • JoeBatters October 13, 2012 at 11:07 AM -

            By the way … Anyone blocking a second term for Obama, in my estimation, is a patriot of the first order.

          • jones.barry November 1, 2012 at 11:22 PM -


          • Rollo October 13, 2012 at 11:18 AM -

            Conservative obstructionist = Those that don’t agree or need to be bribed to march in lock step. It was so much easier in Nazi Germany when those who offered a different opinion could just be shot.

          • Terry Gingo McClinton October 13, 2012 at 11:32 AM -

            May I ask why people who don’t agree with the O AdMINUStration are always considered to be right wing? What about us moderates and or DEMS who do not agree with BS…what is our label? Racist? That’s everyone’s other favorite label…just sad!

          • Florida Girl October 13, 2012 at 11:54 PM -

            Well, it really is sad. The Obama cheerleaders don’t really have any substance to fight back with, so they start a war of words. Thank you for bringing up this point, It is very true that not everyone who disagrees with the golden one is a conservative. But that’s their strategy – name Dems who do not agree with Obama are standing up for what’s right.

          • Morpheus October 22, 2012 at 9:47 PM -

            Thanks Florida Girl and Terry Gingo. I often vote Democrat on the local levels here in Delaware, but presidentially, I am going with Romney and Ryan. It’s a shame and a disappointment regarding how this administration has gone, and even worse how he has chosen to try and explain what he has done, or rather, not bother explaining but simply try attacking the other candidate. It’s embarrassing how he, and even more, Biden, have been acting, but you’re absolutely correct that it doesn’t take far-right partisanship to oppose Obama at this point. It really takes maturity and principle right now.

          • Brewmastergeneral November 1, 2012 at 12:30 PM -

            You nailed it Terry !!!

          • johnleehooker October 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM -

            dims have ALWAYS had plugs biden who, as prez of senate, can ALWAYS vote to break a tie meaning dims did NOT need 60 votes, they needed 59 + plugs veneers biden

          • Graham Oey November 1, 2012 at 4:49 PM -

            The president of the senate only votes when there is a tie. Just so you know…..

          • Linda Dunaway Taylor October 13, 2012 at 5:57 PM -

            Hmm, seems like Mary Landrieu, Joe Lieberman, Scott Brown, Olympia Snowe, the other Rep. woman, can’t remember her name, voted anything and everything Obama wanted. That’s how he got the ACA, as well as all the backroom deals. And don’t forget Bart Stupak, who was promised no money for abortions for his vote, well we all know how that promise stood don’t we? The Dems. were in charge the last two years under Bush, used an Omnibus spending bill instead of a budget. Still haven’t passed a budget under Obama after how many years is it now? I hope to The God Almighty, that he is a one term president.

          • MacMurphy October 13, 2012 at 6:34 PM -

            You’re just another leftist idiot void of facts and substance. When you have a super majority, there is no filibuster capability. Name one filibuster attempted by the repubs while the dems had a super majority. Just one. . . . crickets . . .

          • Florida Cracker October 13, 2012 at 11:49 PM -

            Wow, you are sooooo mixed up.

          • serfdumb November 1, 2012 at 1:15 PM -

            I think you are wasting your time trying to convince anybody here. They have their own set of facts taken directly off of the farce they call Fox News. They have no use for the truth. It just confuses them and does not support their narrative. You just laid out a pretty succinct and truthful history of the obstacles any progressive legislation faced during Obama’s first term but conservatives will never acknowledge that.

      • AKdoc October 13, 2012 at 1:12 AM - Reply

        Mr. Glass:
        You seem to have forgotten that in BHO’s first two years in office he owned both houses; remember Nancy Pelosi, remember Harry Reed..the Republicans were helpless to do anything, i.e. except vote as a block against ObamaCare which passed none-the-less. Then the Americanpeople decided that the Dems behavior was not honorable and overwhelmingly voted the Dems out and gave the Republicans the majority in the house. Your Mr. Reed is the dictionary definition of obstuctionist.

      • stardud October 13, 2012 at 2:28 AM - Reply

        Truth be known: The Seals deserve all the credit.

        • Florida Cracker October 14, 2012 at 12:03 AM - Reply

          Tell it. That’s the truth.

        • Alexander Dunn November 13, 2012 at 2:03 AM - Reply

          Executive order. They didn’t send themselves. Fact.

          • Senior8 November 14, 2012 at 10:39 AM -

            such a profound statement..executive order…… And you probably think that Obama did this all by himself…Bin Laden had been hunted si before Obama wore long pants,so don’t tell me he was the man who killed Bin Laden. Keep drinking the Kool Aid….

      • fd1001 October 13, 2012 at 8:21 AM - Reply

        I just find unbelievable people blaming the congress. People are being brainwashed to forget how a democracy works.
        In just about every democracy (and I mean EVERY) the legislative is as a legitimate a power as the executive. It is also elected by the people – it doesn’t and never was intended only to endorse the executive.

        And, the chief of the executive is also the political leader of the government, and is responsible for negotiation with congress to get what he wants, it is part of his job. People blame Bush for the war in Iraq – and with good reason – even though congress approved of it, but it was his responsibility to get it approved (and also, all the other mess), so he got the blame, deservedly.

        This is the most elementary fact of a democracy, there is something wrong when a full grown-up politician pass on the blame on to the legislative and is supported a-criticaly by the press and a large number of people. A pity, America was such a nice dream.

        • Florida Girl October 14, 2012 at 12:07 AM - Reply

          Well, until the Obama mess, America was a success. He has done nothing good for us or to us. It seems people don’t really know how the government is supposed to work. Even the fact that they are not up in arms over that pitiful, forged birth certificate is sad, it should have them outraged. Too dumb to even get it.

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:57 PM -

            As the saying goes from Obama supporters …. ” Where’s my free shit ” ??

      • Terry Gingo McClinton October 13, 2012 at 11:09 AM - Reply

        WOW! That is just the opposite of what your side is usually shoving down our throats. He COULDN’T get anything done until this article..now, he rides like the cowboy with the biggest gun..able to persuade those on the other side of the room and the other side of the world, effortlessly with his “swagger” if nothing else. You can’t have it both ways……

      • Logo4245 October 13, 2012 at 2:07 PM - Reply

        Oh Ted, you need more bran in your diet.

        • Florida Girl October 14, 2012 at 12:09 AM - Reply

          Either that or he’s had too much bran – and you know what that does. His comments are full of B.S.

      • Florida Cracker October 13, 2012 at 10:58 PM - Reply

        Yep, and the Democrat controlled Senate will not even agree to hear 99% of what the Republican controlled house presents. Need to get Republican majority in the Senate also. Should have done in 2010 but not enough people realized they were being fed cool aid and they were slurping it down.

      • Gleen Scooter October 14, 2012 at 4:08 AM - Reply

        Obama is soley resposible for killing Osama his blood brother yeah right…he loved him…that is like saying Bush is solely resposible for killig the other EVIL HUSSEIN!! too bad he did’t get both the despots as you so rightly call him!!!

        • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 7:14 PM - Reply

          Of course the Navy Seals had nothing to do with it at all! Obama did it all himself ..we all know that…Another glass of Kool Aid please ! !..

      • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 6:25 PM - Reply

        @ Ted Glass “Ask Bin Laden and Somali pirates etc” ?….The last Democratic President ,”Slick Willie” Clinton had Bin Laden and let him go. !!,The USN Seals killed Osama, as well as some of the Somali pirates. Other than making a decision on ongoing intelligence on Osama that had been taking place for many years when Obama was still in his “community fund raiser”, role,he authorized the attack.after the Intel was gathered and he was advised by his military advisers to go for it ! .A supposed Commander-in-Chief who calls a USN Corpsman (medic) a “corpse man” reveals his knowledge of the armed forces he is supposed to be in command of.,and an indicator of his capabilities. ..

      • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:35 PM - Reply

        @Ted Glass “obstructionalist” Republican controlled House…. as opposed to what you probably consider the “constructionalist” Democratic Senate ?? Give me strength !!! Have another drink of Kool Aid…and you’ll feel much better..

    • anafreeka October 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM - Reply

      Man, it is amazing to listen to the crazy Republican fantasies! WOW..

      • Arany October 12, 2012 at 6:48 PM - Reply

        Now that comment illustrates perfectly what’s wrong with liberals – refusing to believe that their political opponents have valid ideas, refusing to debate issues.

        How can you be joking, laughing, clowning, while 23 million people are unemployed, deficits have skyrocketed, 49 million people are on foodstamps, we are staring nuclear holocaust in the face, half of college grads can’t find a job, seniors have lost almost half of their retirement savings, Soc.Sec. and Medicare are on the verge of bankruptcy, unkept promises litter the landscape of the last 4 years, and you say these are “crazy Republican fantasies.”

        • AKdoc October 13, 2012 at 1:33 AM - Reply

          You forgot to mention that this Ultra Liberal Socialist President has spent near six trillion dollars and the average American citizan is no better off today than when this inexperienced narcissist took the helm of the USS American Way…as a matter of fact we are six trillion dollars worse off than four years ago and BHO’s cluelessness will keep my children and my grandchildren from realizing a better life since they will be the ones left to pay of this massive debt. Mr.Obama is not a leader he is a ruler so be careful of what you wish for Mr. Illes.

      • SpeakOfTheTruth October 12, 2012 at 7:41 PM - Reply

        For realz…

      • Stephen Cothren October 12, 2012 at 11:14 PM - Reply

        You are an idiot

      • mike hunt October 13, 2012 at 10:55 AM - Reply

        BAFOONERY&MALARKY to you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • mike hunt October 13, 2012 at 10:57 AM - Reply

        your name correctly defines you-imafreak ahh.

      • Florida Cracker October 14, 2012 at 12:14 AM - Reply

        This is like the pot calling the kettle black. How can you listen to Obama’s fairy tales (lies)?

    • SpeakOfTheTruth October 12, 2012 at 7:40 PM - Reply

      Hmm, you believe everything people say? Do that often?……I can tell…

      • Florida Cracker October 13, 2012 at 10:46 PM - Reply

        Hmm, sounds like you believe everything Obama says. You do that often….I can tell.

    • stardud October 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM - Reply

      The article is so spot on that it’s uncanny. It described Owe bama to a T.
      I have felt as tho I have been in a nightmare that I can’t wake up from since before
      he was elected. Often wondered whether anyone else could see what I saw in him.
      Finally,I will sleep well tonight

      • WingedPegasus October 14, 2012 at 2:08 AM - Reply

        We are certainly not alone. In less than three weeks we will see the largest landslide against Marxism since 1984. Our job is to never allow our country to live from election to election and, to better research who it is we allow to hold the button.

        • John Bowan November 9, 2012 at 2:30 AM - Reply

          I guess Romney is a Marxist.

          • peteywheats November 9, 2012 at 2:51 AM -

            Romney did claim that China wants people to be Free.

          • Harold Nations November 11, 2012 at 3:20 AM -


        • Maybe November 12, 2012 at 12:54 AM - Reply

          I think you got your wings clipped.

        • captaindash November 12, 2012 at 1:38 AM - Reply

          I’m so glad I’m Canadian. We’re self sufficient in energy and food and don’t have the class of nutjobs America has. Obama’s not a marxist (you idiot), and Romney isn’t a evil. They’re both politicians who are far closer than you guys will ever admit. All your left vs right stuff makes us laugh. Have fun competing for our oil, suckas!

          • Katie November 13, 2012 at 1:32 AM -

            The HELL if he isn’t a Marxist. I’ve met many Canadians but not many as rude as you. The “nut-jobs” are the ones who voted for the wannabe dick ta tor in the White House.

            And I’m neither left nor right, so don’t go there.

          • Alexander Dunn November 13, 2012 at 2:01 AM -

            I too am Canadian – and American – and agree with captaindash. This marxist scare tactic is so childish. Thankfully Americans are smarter than to buy into that canard.

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 2:51 AM -

            You’re correct. You’re neither left or right. You’re just an idiot.

          • captaindash November 16, 2012 at 10:03 AM -

            One I notice you associate Obama with a dick. Love ’em dark, do ya? Either way, I think you should go to a country with an actual dictator. Then you might go back home and go “wow, these parties are both different versions of the same thing”. Neither wants slavery, neither wants everything state run, neither wants to enforce sharia law. They both like baseball, and they both like to be able to earn lots of money and spend it as they please. The rich aren’t the ‘job creators’ they claim to be, and the poor really need to pull themselves up by the bootstraps. Basically, both sides are right, and both are wrong. That’s okay. It’s called a democracy. Try appreciating it, as opposed to bitching the sky is falling and that everybody who doesn’t think like you is an idiot. Only I’m allowed to feel that way, ;-P

            Also, look up with a Marxist is. Try the googles (I hear he knows much). Maybe you just need to loosen the chinstrap on your helmet a little there, Chicken Little. America will look more or less the same no matter what party is in charge. That’s why the parties go back and forth in office, and that’s a good thing. Dummy. *hug*

          • Katie November 16, 2012 at 11:48 AM -

            Obviously, you get your news from MSM, so you’re not aware of the agenda being carried out.

            The United States is a Republic, not a “Democracy.” Get that straight…there is a difference. Furthermore, America is never going to look like it did in the past. Actually, why don’t you pay attention to your own country instead of meddling into ours?

            Name calling on the Internet…what a surprise! People are SO brave, mouthing off and sitting in front of a keyboard instead of standing in front of the person they are attacking. Amusing and cowardly at the same time.

          • captaindash November 18, 2012 at 11:34 AM -

            Haha, I loooove America’s obsession with agendas and conspiracies. Yes, the US of A is a democracy, by literal definition in fact.

            “Dummy” hurt your feelings? It’s an opinion, that’s all. Get over it. Thin skin much? You can make all the Igloo and lumberjack jokes you want, it’s okay. I’m not going to blow a gasket.

            And I don’t get my news from just MSM. I get it from all sources. The Economist, the Asian Times, political satire shows, those terrible 24hr networks etc. It means, apparently as opposed to you, I’m educated on all sides. Mostly because as Americas largest trading partner, Canada is affected by US policy. America looooves to get involved in everything all over the world, yet can’t take it when a foreigner has an opinion, which is now considered “meddling”. Get over yourselves. The world thinks of you as the neighbourhood bully. You wanna be down with him because he’s a macho tough guy, but you don’t want to be actually around him any more than you have to.

          • sara December 7, 2012 at 4:49 AM -

            Wonder what Obama’s hair would be like if he let it grow…. all fuzzy wuzzy so that cutting ir down to almost its roots does not show. The Obama man is not the right sort of person, no matter what the world doth say, to be President of the United States of America …..while what do the ‘Red Indians’ have to say about it, after all their ‘Word’ is far more worthy than Obama’s or Michel’s whose great great great great great great grandmother was ‘white’……. Who really cares so long as he/she is a good and worthy person such as Mitt Romney who said openly that he only wanted to be President so that Ann his wife and a ‘Cancer Survivor’ could have been ‘The FIRST LADY’………..

          • Sabyen91 December 9, 2012 at 1:25 AM -

            WTF? Just come out and say “nappy headed n!gger”. You are a disgusting racist.

          • FatJeremyParker April 13, 2015 at 3:36 AM -

            Yaaayy!!!!!! Fat lard ass was even say racist 2 years ago!!!!

            I see you found yourself a Female knigger to chat with tonight Jeremy. I notice you guys like to gang up on people…twunts.

            Here is apicture is dimplasm… 🙂 You LARD ASS!

          • sara December 7, 2012 at 3:46 AM -

            Indeed ‘name-calling’…. that is the one thing Obama excelled in during electioneering time when his spiteful, sleazy and jealous character came shining through against his opponing Contender the full-blooded gentlemanly American with the right Profile as President, came full vent upon him from Obama’s very own scathing lips. Yet Obama was voted in. The ‘Devil’s Luck’ goes to the ‘Devil’ they say…..

          • MattT November 18, 2012 at 1:14 AM -

            BULLSHIT. You are right wing to the rightest right possible.

          • Sabyen91 December 9, 2012 at 1:24 AM -

            You are an idiot.

          • FatJeremyParker April 13, 2015 at 3:40 AM -

            Errr American Sniper Man!!! I bet that makes your homosexual blood boil.

          • SayHi2YourMom4Me November 14, 2012 at 3:27 AM -

            BTW the US is set to become the world’s biggest oil producer in the upcoming years, so, um, you have fun competing for OUR oil there, my canadian buddy!

          • captaindash November 16, 2012 at 9:51 AM -

            That makes no sense. If we are self sufficient with our Canadian supply of oil, why would we compete for American oil just because America one day produces more? If you have a home garden and produce enough carrots for your family, would you really feel the need to buy carrots from me because I produce twice as much? BTW, I did say hi 2 my mom 4 you (as your name suggests). She smiled and remembered all the good times.

          • SayHi2YourMom4Me November 16, 2012 at 4:36 PM -

            Converse logic applies. If the US becomes the biggest oil producer, why would we compete for YOUR oil as you said? Please, spare me your retarded carrot stories. Oil is bought and sold on the international market anyway by big traders and it can potentially come from anywhere that produces it. I mean, it’s not really something I’m an expert in, but I’m pretty sure Canada is exporting and importing oil and fuel all over the place, just like everyone else is. Oh, and please spare me your retarded carrot stories.

          • captaindash November 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM -

            Uh…..stay in school. The ‘reverse logic’ theory makes even less sense than your first comment, silly. I never said you’d compete for oir oil if you produced enough for yourselves. Maybe I’ll type slower. Silly American. The carrot logic still applies because as of now, we export oil to you. If that situation changes, and the oil sands up here dry out, we will import oil from you. See, this is why the world hates America (and I’ve lived in So Cal and travelled all over the US so I am well versed in American collective thought). They hate you because no matter what, you have to justify everything where America comes out on top. If you’re attacked, it’s because the world is jealous of your freedoms. If you’re broke, it’s because you have to police the world blah blah blah. I lived there during sept 11th. I can’t count how often I heard the term “sleeping giant”. Really? Nobody awoke the sleeping giant. The wars fought since were a dismal failure and are bankrupting you. That sucks for Canada since we are America’s number one trading partner. By a considerable margin, I might add. Most Americans think China is all that economically matters to ya’ll, yet your chilly hat of a neighbour trades hundreds of billions more with you. Yes, we are very influential, and until 2020, you’ll be importing oil from us. And water. Probably carrots too. So play nice.

          • SayHi2YourMom4Me November 18, 2012 at 7:26 PM -

            Whoops did I get a little nasty? “Play nice” goes both ways. Sorry for trying to come out on top, you know, up until right now I thought that was something that people in general liked to do, but I suppose it’s just an American thing like you said. Look, you did say “enjoy competing for our oil” or something along those lines… so what do you think is going to happen when your number one trading partner becomes a net exporter in a decade or two? I never insulted Canada. I never claimed to know stuff about Canadians or assumed I know how they all thought. If you want to play nice, then play nice!

          • rob December 2, 2012 at 3:35 AM -

            I too am a Canadian and Canada is crawling with marxists. I know one when I see one and Obama is a communist.

          • captaindash December 2, 2012 at 9:30 PM -

            Really? You can identify a communist visually? That’s incredible especially considering your latest sighting involves the man at the head of the wealthiest capitalist democracy of all time. If you wanna split hairs, America technically isn’t totally capitalist. In all of North America you pay a large percentage of your wages to the government who redistributes it. Therefore they’re socialist democracies. And yes, there are marxists in every country. Just like there are child molesters in every country. Doesn’t mean Obama is a communist. Stay in school. Preferably below the 49th parallel where your conspiracy fear mongering might find more traction. Our winters are too slippery for that.

        • Katie November 13, 2012 at 1:33 AM - Reply

          Unfortunately, there are too many really stupid people in our country. Fools… they just voted to destroy this country.

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 2:51 AM -

            No, they didn’t, Katie. Romney didn’t get elected.

          • Katie November 14, 2012 at 12:05 PM -

            Obozo’s background should tell you a lot. Unfortunately, the cheer-leading liberal media continues to cover for him. Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals were implemented during the campaign. See the movie 2016 Obama’s America, The Hope and the Change, and lastly, why don’t you read his books. In his own words, he said he will “side with the Muslims when the political winds shift.” The people in Germany loved Hitler too. So you can attack me all you want. There are so many disturbing facts about this fraud in the WH it is frightening. But instead of paying attention to these conveniently hidden facts, you chose to instead believe the attack ads that targeted Mr. Romney, most of which were out and out lies. (see Rules for Radicals…that’s how to handle an opponent when you have no record to run on)

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM -

            Obama’s background *does* tell me a lot. Your false idea of his background is informed by your need to not like him.

            Do you even know what “Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals” is?

            I’ve seen the mock documentary by Dinesh D’Souza. It’s a piece of work. He does a great job crafting an entire tapestry of lies from just a few kernels of truth. Oh, you thought it was all truth? He tricked *you*, didn’t he?

            You really think he’ll “side with the Muslims when the political winds shift”? You really think he said that in one of his books? Why don’t you respond with the name of the book and the page number we can all find it on.

            Obama has a great record to run on. Romney was the one telling all the lies. It’s unfortunate that you can’t see that. Now, you can sit there and complain or you can get to work with the majority that voted for Obama and get this country moving forward.

          • Katie November 14, 2012 at 12:38 PM -

            Anyone who was MENTORED by a Communist makes me wonder about their thinking. Our belief systems are formed in childhood.

            I posted the quote from the book a few minutes ago.

            If he had such a great record to run on, why didn’t he just campaign by bragging about this “record”? He even said when he was a senator that those with no record to run on just attack their opponents.

            This “majority” you speak of is a laugh. Not exactly a landslide, far from it. I’m not “getting to work” with his supporters. I firmly disagree with his policies, and there are many others that feel the same way, the other half of the country.

            Other than that, I won’t continue this debate since I have bigger fish to fry. I’ll not continue arguing with idiots. It’s a waste of time. Instead I’m preparing for what is going to happen to this country. Watch and see…

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 12:57 PM -

            So now Alinsky was a communist? What *exactly* is a communist? Interestingly, Alinsky was asked in an interview if he’d ever considered joining the Communist Party. This was his response:

            “Not at any time. I’ve never joined any organization—not even the ones I’ve organized myself. I prize my own independence too much. And philosophically, I could never accept any rigid dogma or ideology, whether it’s Christianity or Marxism. One of the most important things in life is what Judge Learned Hand described as ‘that ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether you’re right.’ If you don’t have that, if you think you’ve got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated. The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by such religious and political and racial fanatics, from the persecutions of the Inquisition on down to Communist purges and Nazi genocide.”

            Further, there’s no way Obama could have been mentored by Alinsky. Obama was born in 1961. He was in Hawaii until the age of 6. Then he moved to Indonesia. He returned to Hawaii in 1971 at the age of 10. Alinsky died in 1972. Not much opportunity to be mentored, is there?

            You “quoted” something earlier, but you didn’t indicate which book or what page I can find it on. You won’t either, because it isn’t in any of his books. Nice try though.

            If you think Obama didn’t run on his record, you weren’t paying attention to anything he said this election cycle. He talked about reducing unemployment. He talked about ending the war in Iraq and the drawdown in Afghanistan. He talked about getting Bin Laden. He talked about saving the auto industry. He talked about repairing and strengthening our foreign relations. He talked about strong sanctions against Iran. He talked about numerous things on his record.

            Yes, a majority is still a majority. He won by approximately 3% of the vote. Why does it have to be a landslide for you to get on board?

            I suspect you “firmly disagree with his policies” because you’re grossly misinformed about what those policies are. Maybe start by turning off Fox News, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh.

            By “prepare for what is going to happen to this country” you mean sit on your hands while progressives get to work and get things done, right?

          • Katie November 16, 2012 at 12:06 PM -

            Obozo was mentored by Frank Marshall Davis. Davis was a friend of Obobo’s grandparents, who were also Communists.

            Obozo was registered in Hawaii when he was four days old. That’s why he uses a “certificate of live birth.” Anyone could get one in Hawaii at the time … it didn’t matter WHERE they were born.

            Just keep believing his BS. “HE” didn’t get Bin Laden. The Navy Seals did. “HE” didn’t “save” the auto industry. The TAXPAYERS did and they are STILL owed billions of dollars.

            And yeah, uh-huh, “HE” sure has strengthened our relationship with Israel. The animosity he has exhibited toward “Bebe” is blatantly obvious.

            And on and on… You really give this man too much credit. I just don’t buy his story. You’ve made your choice. It wasn’t mine and I’ll stick with that belief.

          • OregonJeff November 16, 2012 at 12:39 PM -

            You have any proof that A) Frank Marshall Davis was a mentor of Obama or that B) Davis or Obama’s grandparents were Communists?

            Can you define Communist?

            Obama was born in Hawaii. If you’re going to go the whole birther route then you clearly have no attachment to reality.

            Yes, the Navy Seals were the ones who actually got Bin Laden. Historically speaking, however, Obama will get the credit for that every bit as much as previous presidents have been given credit for things accomplished under their leadership.

            The same is true for the auto industry. The American taxpayer doesn’t get any credit whatsoever. The American taxpayer didn’t want anything to do with the bailout. However, it’s the President’s leadership that resulted in that bailout happening. Historically speaking, he will get credit for it. Yes, there’s still some money owed in those bailouts, but it’s secured in preferred stock. As GM continues to grow, that stock value will continue to grow. At some point, the government can sell that stock and recoup any outstanding balance owed.

            I don’t know where you get this idea that he’s exhibited animosity towards Israel or Bibi Netanyahu (it’s not “Bebe”).

            You should quit listening to the crap on FOX.

          • DB1954 December 6, 2012 at 3:16 AM -

            All you have to do is go online and find it. It’s hardly a secret to half the people I know, and they’re all college graduates.

          • OregonJeff December 6, 2012 at 3:48 AM -

            No, no, that’s not how it works. You made the claim so the burden of proof is on you. If that’s not how it worked I could make a silly statement like “there are three different colors of unicorns that live in the Rocky Mountains”. You’d be hard-pressed to prove me wrong. 😉

          • DB1954 December 6, 2012 at 3:15 AM -

            Frank Marshall Davis was Obama’s “mentor” from age 10 to about 18. He was also his biological father. Look at the pics of Davis and Obama Jr., then look at Obama Sr. Junior looks NOTHING like his alleged father, and almost a dead ringer for Davis.

          • DB1954 December 6, 2012 at 3:13 AM -

            Alinsky purposively refused to say that he was a communist. That was and is still today his strategy. Alinsky never admitted what he really was–a Marxist.

          • OregonJeff December 6, 2012 at 3:40 AM -

            Or, perhaps the more reasonable response is that he wasn’t a communist and didn’t see any value in being labeled.

            Oh, and “is still his strategy today”? You do know that Alinsky died many years ago, right?

            I find it curious that you somehow magically know that he was a Marxist.

          • Ralph Martin December 7, 2012 at 2:05 AM -

            I for one voted for what I hope to be the next dictator. Hopefully he’ll start by executing the opposition. Thankfully he already intercepts all electronic communications and has identified domestic terrorists for indefinite detention and extrajudicial termination. Like Katie for instance.

        • NoeValleyJim November 14, 2012 at 2:35 AM - Reply

          WingedPegasus? More like Clipped Parrot.

        • SayHi2YourMom4Me November 14, 2012 at 3:26 AM - Reply

          How’d that landslide turn out?

          • Katie November 14, 2012 at 12:07 PM -

            Obozo didn’t exactly win by a landslide. In fact, Obozo won with less votes than he garnered in 2008…the only president in history who won a second term with less votes than the first election. Some people DID wake up.

        • musico December 5, 2012 at 1:15 AM - Reply

          In less than three weeks we will see the largest landslide against Marxism since 1984

          The republican party is a MARXISM PARTY???????

      • Observingo Dash November 1, 2012 at 3:38 PM - Reply

        he may have a deep down a feeling of inferiority and guilt of having been such a deceptive person but that would be very uncomfortable to live with so he may have developed the exact opposite view of himself, psychiatrists call that as reaction formation

      • isohappynow November 1, 2012 at 5:21 PM - Reply

        The nightmare was the one Bush created with his incompetence, allowing over 3000 people to die, allowing the debt to escalate, allowing Wall Street to go wild while we almost went into another depression. Thanks alot Republicans!

        • bytebear November 1, 2012 at 10:30 PM - Reply

          Ironically, each of those things can be attributed to Democratic decisions, from Clinton decimating our military and failing to pursue Bin Laden, to the regulations of Fanny and Freddy which caused the housing bubble (thanks to Barney Frank), to congress switching sides from Rep to Dem in ’06 which then changed policies despite Bush, which caused the economic meltdown.

          • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:31 PM -

            Not to mention that President “Slick Willy” Clinton had Bin Laden and let him go…or has everyone forgot ?1..

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 2:52 AM -

            Oh, how you repaint history with your own broad, revisionist brush.

          • Senior8 November 14, 2012 at 10:36 AM -

            Repaint history ?…revisionist brush /!! What are you smoking ?!! That is a fact, so obviously you’re one of the sheeple that got Odumbo re-elected. There’s nothing worse than those who refuse to see !.

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 12:15 PM -

            Please explain how President Clinton “let him go”.

            Then, for extra credit, explain why Bush when *actually* quit looking for Bin Laden and said he wasn’t a priority how that *wasn’t* “letting him go”.

            You mad because Obama (a Democrat) got the job done?

          • Senior8 November 14, 2012 at 1:12 PM -

            USN Seals “got the job done” and don’t even try to say Obama got the job done even though he claims it !!…….Obama has as much knowledge about the US military as Big Bird… Oh wait….he calls USN medics (Corpsmen) “Corpse men” and also the USN has “ships” underwater….the dumb ass doesn’t even know that they are called submarines and they are “boats!” Of course he knows how to sign his name and that was the extent of his participation/knowledge..The military “got the job done” and don’t forget it !
            Some Commander-in-Chief” !

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 1:21 PM -

            Sure they got the job done. They didn’t send themselves, however. They didn’t authorize the programs that got the intel they needed. They didn’t authorize Bin Laden’s capture or death. Obama did all that.

            If you’re going to make the case that Obama doesn’t get at least some credit for getting Bin Laden, then you can’t also say Clinton gets the credit for letting him go.

            “Not to mention that President “Slick Willy” Clinton had Bin Laden and let him go…or has everyone forgot ?1..”

            Yeah, just like that.

            Guaranteed Obama has more military knowledge than you do. You’re being petty about his mispronouncing “corpsman”. I’m sure you’ve never mispronounced a word in your life. His reference to “ships” was intentional. He was mirroring Romney’s ridiculous statements about “ships”. Obama knows they’re called submarines. He said “We have these ‘ships that go underwater’. They’re called nuclear submarines.”

            If this is the best you’ve got against Obama, you might as well quit because this is pathetic.

          • Senior8 November 14, 2012 at 1:28 PM -

            You’re absolutely right …My knowledge gained from 30 years in the USN count for nothing. !.Thanks for your expertise on EVERYTHING……another “arm chair” general. the US is full of them ! “Fall out you’re dismissed” !…. …….

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 1:36 PM -

            So you have lots of USN knowledge. That doesn’t mean you have the ultimate military knowledge.

          • Senior8 November 15, 2012 at 5:24 PM -

            I didn’t claim to have the “ultimate” but I can guarantee that I have a hell of a lot more than you or Obama ! Give me a break !!

          • OregonJeff November 15, 2012 at 5:25 PM -

            Predictably, this has become more about you than about the ridiculous statements you started with that I challenged.

          • Katie November 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM -

            You are entitled to your own opinions but not to your own facts.

          • OregonJeff November 14, 2012 at 12:16 PM -

            You know, it’s ironic that you’d use such a cliche statement in defense of your own position.

          • Sam_Dobermann November 18, 2012 at 4:06 AM -

            This is just silly. The military cutback was done during Bush I when Cheney was SecDef: it was their “peace dividend” and needed to make the deficit look smaller.

            Barney Frank had nothing to do with the housing bubble; as a Democrat he had no power to do much to even affect legislation. Besides, neither Fannie nor Freddy make housing loans. It was George W Bush with his goal of putting 5.5 million minority families into their “own” home as part of his “Ownership society” that did it. George even order banks and mortgage brokers to come up with more “creative” ways to finance home buying. it was george Bush who said that not having a down payment or having poor credit shouldn’t mean you couldn’t buy a home. (Look up GW Bush’s press release on Oct 15, 2003 and others available in his archives.) George Bush blew the housing bubble.

            The housing market started to crash in 2006, however the Democrats didn’t take office until January 2007 and Old Bush found and used his veto pen. Policies hardly changed.

            You have been given pith poor talking points. Pathetic Republicans,

            There are two types of Republicans, the rich and the stupid. The rich ones strive to keep the stupid ones stupid and the stupid ones strive to keep the rich ones rich.

        • jones.barry November 1, 2012 at 11:20 PM - Reply

          what color is the sky in your world?

        • Senior8 November 2, 2012 at 7:30 PM - Reply

          Hello…….calling Planet Earth …are you there isohappynow ?!!

    • waraji October 13, 2012 at 6:29 AM - Reply

      This is a fake article. Do you really think the president’s advisers were interviewed ? …If you do then I have some gold to sell you at 25% off ! ^o^

      • Rollo October 13, 2012 at 11:14 AM - Reply

        When can I pick up some to that gold?

        • waraji October 13, 2012 at 5:46 PM - Reply

          When can you prove that the president’s advisers gave interviews ?

          • ogrrre October 13, 2012 at 6:13 PM -

            Moving the goal posts, aren’t you? Your statement was, “[d]o you really think the president’s advisers were interviewd? If you do than I have some godt to sell you at 25% off.” You didn’t say “if you can prove…”, you said, “if you [really think]”. So, waraji, you owe Rollo some gold.

          • waraji October 13, 2012 at 7:28 PM -

            You want something for nothing? Work at it a little. Do you seriously think the president’s advisors and aids were interviewed for the “info” in this article?

          • Florida Cracker October 13, 2012 at 10:54 PM -

            The president’s advisors and aides are so tired of carrying him and covering for him, they are venting to the press finally. The truth will eventually come out. It has been said before that Obama loves campaigning, but dislikes the work on a day in day out basis. Probably why he golfs more than he attends security briefings. Good grief, open you eyes and get a look at what’s happening. You can’t be this thick.

          • waraji October 14, 2012 at 3:03 AM -

            Do you have proof of advisors and aides venting?

            Do you have proof of “…he golfs more than he attends security briefings”?

          • Gleen Scooter October 14, 2012 at 4:05 AM -

            EVE PMSNBC ad C said so ad that is the same as straight from the DNC ad his own Aides as he wouldn’t tell you as he would ot be at the WhiteHouse to aswer as he would be out playig golf ad lying about his scores like he lies about everythig else icludig how ofte he golfs copared to how ofte he attends security briefigs..He ad Joe Bide eve used the excuse they never got requests for more security from BenGhazi that would have been told to them durig the security briefigs..that though would have bee relayed to him by his aides so more lies by the arsehole in chief your buttbuddy!

          • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 6:11 PM -

            @waraji Do you have any proof that he doesn’t ??

          • Gleen Scooter October 14, 2012 at 4:00 AM -

            wacko his aids hate him too fool! He probably has give a few of them AIDS too as he is one pile of excrement full of scabs and open puss sores!

          • Gleen Scooter October 14, 2012 at 3:58 AM -

            IT will be fool’s gold because obviously this jerk is a fool like Obama ad guarateed to be racist as he is too!

          • Florida Cracker October 13, 2012 at 10:48 PM -

            Did ya ever hear of “leaks” from the White House or un-named source?

          • waraji October 14, 2012 at 3:09 AM -

            That’s not proof. Of course I’ve heard of using an “un-named source”, but I don’t run my life from stories like those.

            If stories from un-named sources run your life, mark this thumbs down.

        • Gleen Scooter October 14, 2012 at 3:56 AM - Reply

          Wouldn’t do it,this is an Obama supporter after all so it is stolen and then has been drilled out and filled with tungsten!!This guy is so crooked he makes Obama look like kin!

    • politically informed person November 1, 2012 at 3:01 PM - Reply

      this site is a heavily biased conservative sink that doesn’t actually have any informative purpose other than that of pointing out flaws, some that don’t even exist. he underestimated Romney, but even still, he prepared a lot. where does this guy get his information? Fox News?

    • Duh November 2, 2012 at 8:32 AM - Reply

      and a tin foil hat for you

    • Guest November 2, 2012 at 8:44 AM - Reply

      Owe bama…..really? Ok fact time the debt will be at about $16.5 trillion dollars thats $5.9 trillion more than when he took office. Ok math time. When Bush came to office we had no debt in fact we were $2 trillion dollars in the black. So 16.5-5.9=10.6(the debt when bush left office) 10.6+2= 12.6. Ok that is 12.6 trillion dollars that Bush burned thru so even if you take Obamas debt and double it its still less than bush. Romeny wants the same finacial policies as the bush admin and that is what you want for the country a possible $25.2 trillion debt instead of a $16.9 trillion dollar debt..you people confuse me to no end. Feel free to check my numbers im not making shit up here people

    • Alexander Dunn November 13, 2012 at 1:59 AM - Reply

      God your ilk are tiresome. Get over it – your views are past due and long expired.

    • california republic November 17, 2012 at 1:20 AM - Reply

      Opinions expressed in your post connote cognitive dysfunction typical of fascist propaganda.

  187. scmaize October 12, 2012 at 7:55 AM - Reply

    Obama did lose the debate, but this article is ridiculously biased, pretending to understand the inner workings of Obama’s mind, and interpreting his thoughts and behavior in ways that are not remotely supportable. The article is pure fiction, and the author reveals much more about himself than about Obama.

    • Steve Snow October 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM - Reply

      The inner workings of Obama’s mind are shown daily by his own actions.

      • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:41 PM - Reply

        I agree, like repealing Dont ask dont tell and killing bin laden! Thanks!

    • sara October 12, 2012 at 12:57 PM - Reply

      Obama didn’t have his Teleprompter you Genious you. The reason he kept looking down so often was that he was hoping it would magically appear, because he was fumbling for his words meanwhile………

    • jessix October 12, 2012 at 1:09 PM - Reply

      This was not the only place where the psychology behind Obama’s behavior was was easily seen He has the personality and the character flaws of a dictator and this shows in everything he does.

      What isn’t visible was his affirmative action education. Surely he should have understood he had help all the way – or, maybe he did and that’s why he stated so strongly that,
      “If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.”

      That’s the story of Affirmative Action, and that’s OUR president! No responsibility and full of excuses all the way!

    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:42 PM - Reply

      I agree. His extrapolated arguments are pure fiction indeed! More living in fantasy land alternate reality universe for those on the right…

  188. Soulphoenix October 12, 2012 at 7:52 AM - Reply

    Great article! Powerfully written and right on target. And let’s not forget just how far Obama’s disdain reaches – to the more than half of us that don’t support him. He can’t stand us.

    So it’s time again to show a sitting President that the power in this country ultimately resides with the people, not with him. He’ll have had his one term, and we’ll have learned a valuable lesson in the dangers of gullibility.

    • Abu Basama October 12, 2012 at 9:28 AM - Reply

      Be quiet. Go read or something.

      • Steve Cox October 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM - Reply

        You should follow your own advise, You sound like you could be his running mate.

      • Soulphoenix October 12, 2012 at 3:25 PM - Reply

        Typical Liberal “free speech” protection – if you don’t agree with me, you have to shut up.

        It would be hilarious if it weren’t so aggravating.

    • Donna Kay Bynum October 12, 2012 at 11:36 AM - Reply

      WELL SAID!!!

    • River of Light October 12, 2012 at 12:42 PM - Reply

      Did you notice that he got elected by the people? People who care about truth and ethics.

      • damion October 12, 2012 at 1:50 PM - Reply

        yep, but the ‘people’ realize they have been had……

        • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:18 PM - Reply

          Let’s hope so…

      • Steve Cox October 12, 2012 at 2:40 PM - Reply

        Obama was elected by a desperate majority the did not look at the real goods.

      • Soulphoenix October 12, 2012 at 3:21 PM - Reply

        Agreed – most of us care about truth and ethics. But we can be fooled, and that’s what our Jester-in-Chief is counting on.

        • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:19 PM - Reply

          As I often repeat “You can fool SOME of the people ALL of the time,ALL of the people SOME of the time,but you can’t fool ALL of the people ALL of the time !

      • Arany October 12, 2012 at 6:56 PM - Reply

        People DO still care about truth and ethics, that is why many people will not vote for him ever again.

      • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:17 PM - Reply

        I recall watching (and being amazed) at a TV reporter in a black neighborhood during the pre election run up in 2008 asking people what they thought of the Republican candidates and their promises for election..NOT ONE asked even knew who they even were,but were openly verbal that they were voting for Obama,and stated that they had never bothered to vote before…That speaks volumes.for what may just happen again this upcoming election sadly…If so …the “late great USA” will result….

    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM - Reply

      But Romney writes off 47% of the country? That who really has a disdain for their opposition!

      • Soulphoenix October 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM - Reply

        Well, some people are completely unable to separate an election strategy (that is, which voter groups to focus on) from a plan for governing once elected.

        In BOTH cases, Obama ignores those who won’t ever support him, not just in his election strategy. Hope, Change, and Unity were a carefully fabricated election LIE.

        • Sniffbandit October 12, 2012 at 10:20 PM - Reply

          I only wish Obama would ignore me. It is much worse than that. He attacks so many people. Doctors cut off legs vs treating diabetes, people that work for insurance compnaies are greedy, people that work at banks are evil, cops that arrest his friends act stupidly, anyone who works for a drug company, an oil company, coal workers, religious organizations, GM’s secured bond holders, GM’s non-union workers’ pension funds, small business owners, anyone who has worked hard and is successful. It would be fantastic to just have him leave us alone. All he seem to like are the unemployed, fire fighters, teachers and union workers. If he hasn’t come after you, your business, or where you work yet, give it time, he will.

      • Arany October 12, 2012 at 6:54 PM - Reply

        He did not write them off, he said 47% will never vote for him no matter what. This is TRUE. Why is this considered “disdain”???

      • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:06 PM - Reply

        In truth, can you actually say that he is 100% incorrect with his statement ?
        I would suggest a disclosure of just how many Americans (legal/illegal) have/are/will continue living in the welfare world as a way of life,and have no intention of gainful employment would be very interesting to see. In most countries there is a sub-culture of “Don’t work/won’t work” and the USA is included. My statement is directed towards the Obama administration as well as the Republican,,and solely an attempt to get at the true facts.not politically driven statements…

    • political ruse October 12, 2012 at 3:52 PM - Reply

      lol gullibility yeah?

      gullibility is thinking there is any difference between obama and any future president who will replace him, they’re all just different faces of the same dictatorial government.

      lol the power is with the people? you are killing me here, how can so many people be so gullible? the people have no say in how the country is run, the slave drivers give you the illusion of choice by letting you “pick” a new president every few years, giving you an insignificant individual vote for one of two people that THEY already decided on, just to give everyone a new face to get angry at over the next few years, before it’s time tolet them angrily chase him out and replace him with another decoy… meanwhile NOTHING EVER CHANGES.

      “democracy” is nothing but a scam, a dictatorial government with a face that changes to give the illusion that the people control it, while nothing could ever possibly be further from the truth, politicians never, NEVER represent the wishes of their constituents, they have their own agendas and obligations to financial supporters, no law was ever passed because the people wanted it or lifted because the people wanted rid of, no politician works for the people, not one, they only sere themselves

      • Soulphoenix October 12, 2012 at 4:50 PM - Reply

        Ouch, your outlook is very dark. I do understand where you’re coming from, though, and there is some truth there. We’re going to have to be even stronger.

      • Arany October 12, 2012 at 6:53 PM - Reply

        What other form of government would you suggest? Be specific.

        As far as “no law was ever passed because the people wanted it” – perhaps you are not familiar with California’s ballot initiatives? Have you never heard of Prop. 13, for instance?

      • Tom Walley White October 13, 2012 at 2:45 AM - Reply

        This guy has it 100% correct….. But you have to look a lil deeper if barry gets another 4 years you can kiss our 2nd amendment goobye…. for you barry supporters ,,, thats our right to keep an bare arms , an for that reason an that reason alone……. I’m voting for the other guy…. romney. I hate to do it cause I know he;ll keep us in these endless wars an we will still bully anybody who doesnt agree with the true rulers…….. AN i dont mean the rich they are SLAVES TO they just learned how to play the game and I mean no disrespect Im talkin about the federal reserve think about it 13 or so family’s controlling the flow of our money NOW THATS POWER an its power that doesnt belong to them

        • MarMar October 13, 2012 at 3:41 AM - Reply

          I have a right to bare arms? Oh good, I hate long sleeved shirts.

      • waraji October 13, 2012 at 6:16 AM - Reply

        Nothing ever changes if you give up. I suggest people vote. I don’t care who you vote for, just get involved and vote. And as Arany pointed out, Many huge things have been done with ballot initiatives, which got onto the ballot by a citizen’s hard work in starting a petition drive. Start one yourself instead of whining?

    • MarMar October 13, 2012 at 3:38 AM - Reply

      I think you’re confusing him with Romney, you know, the guy who trashed the 47%?

    • Jessica Lucinda Williams October 13, 2012 at 10:55 AM - Reply

      don’t tap dance, say what you really mean.

    • Jessica Lucinda Williams October 13, 2012 at 10:55 AM - Reply

      don’t tap dance, say what you really mean.

  189. Language is my Pet Peeve October 12, 2012 at 4:19 AM - Reply

    Someone needs to proofread this shit! Hard to believe there are so many errors in a document published for public consumption!

    • Donna Kay Bynum October 12, 2012 at 11:34 AM - Reply

      get over it……and stop being annul!!!

    • sara October 12, 2012 at 12:49 PM - Reply

      If there were, they would not be so openly published. At any rate it has already been stated that Obama means to be his meanest and most deliberately malicious he can be in the next Round with Romey. It was cosy in the White House while giving orders and taking none and Obama is not giving away any of it to anyone else…..

      • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:35 PM - Reply

        If by meanest and deliberately malicious you mean calling out Romney’s lies and fabrications… then yes i think so.

    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:34 PM - Reply

      Is it any wonder that uneducated opinions like this author’s have those types of obvious errors? I think not.

  190. Proud American October 12, 2012 at 2:00 AM - Reply

    Scathing review – and right on target!

    • Abu Basama October 12, 2012 at 9:29 AM - Reply

      Go learn to be smart u idiot

  191. weavermomo October 12, 2012 at 12:53 AM - Reply

    Obama & Romney both suck, why couldn’t we get someone in there with a mind of there own for a change. (like Ron Paul) For some reason Americans like puppets.

    • mandawg October 12, 2012 at 12:55 AM - Reply

      Well, for one thing, Ron Paul is crazy and his expiration date is much sooner.

    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM - Reply

      Romney is indeed a puppet, thanks for admitting that.

    • Alex October 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM - Reply

      The truth is some sections of Americans are just interested in personality issues. To me it’s not about how best the candidates talk that matters. There are great distinction between speech and action. Americans should not depend their future on mere words of politicians. The truth is Americans really need help for a better future. The American problem was not created by Obama, the problem in my view started long ago but they didn’t realize it. The bush Administration really destroyed the American economy since the government per security issues over spent and was war oriented than focusing on the deficits. Likewise the banks just looking to their gain margins. America at this moment needs unity of action not just a section of politicians to use mere words to guarantee the safety of Americans. It’s not time for which party or personality to fix the problem. We shouldn’t look at parties, if then one can say the democrates will be better since Mr. Clinton fix the economy, gave it to Mr. Bush who destroyed it by going to fight an enemy that he has no direct plan to fight and rather destroyed innocent countries. I think the Obama administration is under a lot PREASURE causing the Americans not to look back and see the great jobs they are doing from inheriting an economy attacked by financial crisis whose real identity was revealed by Mr. Bush and the Wall Street etc, killing Osama who Mr. Bush used as a medium to cause collateral damage to innocent individuals and several countries who depend on the US currency etc for survival. Americans like any other country needs unity at this moment. God bless America

  192. Raejean Imler French October 11, 2012 at 11:31 PM - Reply

    I know he is clueless, but it was pretty obvious how uncomfortable he was throughout, so I don’t buy this.

  193. noizy October 11, 2012 at 11:24 PM - Reply

    Romney only “won” if you mean lied a lot while smiling. On facts and policy Obama slaughtered him.

    • hottrika October 12, 2012 at 2:39 AM - Reply

      We all saw how obummer WON.

    • James October 12, 2012 at 5:58 AM - Reply

      Clueless. Unless maybe you’re just kidding? That’s it isn’t it? Sometimes the sarcasm is just too subtle for me. Sorry if that was your intent then I apologize. Or maybe he only won because Obama is a loser? And that was a week ago and now Biden has lost, if you mean smiled a lot while lying. Oh yea the economy doing great and that Ambassador thing in Libya that Obama has been lying about for weeks. Other than the economy and foreign policy and well everything else Obama is doing a great job. Fantastic Debate performance by Both members of the Obama/Biden Clown Club.

      • Abu Basama October 12, 2012 at 9:39 AM - Reply

        Politics is not a sport u idiotic republican. Romney is a waste of space but you cant see that because you yanks support ur politicians like you would support a football team. This aint football!! you cant just support an idiot because he’s a republican. I think Obama is shit but I cannot see Romney being better in any way.

        • Valsopinion October 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM - Reply

          How is it that YOU keep calling people “idiots”? Get off of your high horse. If you aren’t an American (as you imply) then why do you even give a rat’s ass? Just go away. (please!)

      • sara October 12, 2012 at 1:16 PM - Reply

        LIBYA !!! when the popular Ambassador Chris Stevens even begged for more Security which statement was found in his Diary after he was murdered…. Where was Obama then ? playing golf or baseball or whatever else he preferred doing but his Duties as President. Is this a ‘Commander-in-Chief’ who has not done a days’s duty in any Military Academy In the USA..? and with a simple nod of the head allowed the American Heroic Seals to capture Osama bin Laden when Barak Obama [sounds similar doesn’t it] would not have known the first thing of how to go about it …..

    • Abu Basama October 12, 2012 at 11:28 AM - Reply

      Another person who is intelligent and obviously not a republican

    • Alex October 13, 2012 at 12:40 AM - Reply

      The truth is some sections of Americans are just interested in personality issues. To me it’s not about how best the candidates talk that matters. There are great distinction between speech and action. Americans should not depend their future on mere words of politicians. The truth is Americans really need help for a better future. The American problem was not created by Obama, the problem in my view started long ago but they didn’t realize it. The bush Administration really destroyed the American economy since the government per security issues over spent and was war oriented than focusing on the deficits. Likewise the banks just looking to their gain margins. America at this moment needs unity of action not just a section of politicians to use mere words to guarantee the safety of Americans. It’s not time for which party or personality to fix the problem. We shouldn’t look at parties, if then one can say the democrates will be better since Mr. Clinton fix the economy, gave it to Mr. Bush who destroyed it by going to fight an enemy that he has no direct plan to fight and rather destroyed innocent countries. I think the Obama administration is under a lot PREASURE causing the Americans not to look back and see the great jobs they are doing from inheriting an economy attacked by financial crisis whose real identity was revealed by Mr. Bush and the Wall Street etc, killing Osama who Mr. Bush used as a medium to cause collateral damage to innocent individuals and several countries

  194. Jumbayama NOmoreBama October 11, 2012 at 7:36 PM - Reply

    Gee. Even Europeans are seeing the reality of our Kenyan president, and how he’s failed America with his lies.

    • mandawg October 12, 2012 at 12:56 AM - Reply

      Don’t talk about “lies” unless you include the guy nobody in your party wanted as President until they ran out crazies to pick.

      • James October 12, 2012 at 6:03 AM - Reply

        Crazies? What like Obama, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, Wasserman-Schultz and the list goes on. The whole Democrat Party leadership is nothing but a bunch of crazies. the Democrat party has no choice but to pick crazies because that is what the entire leadership of the party is made up of.

        • River of Light October 12, 2012 at 12:49 PM - Reply


          • James October 12, 2012 at 3:53 PM -


          • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:26 PM -

            Don’t get nasty.now ! We are NOT politicians, just people expressing their opinions !

        • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:31 PM - Reply

          Ditto for the Republicans. Only you know..its true.

          • James October 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM -

            Hey Ted not going to try to argue that. Of course I am disappointed by the political leadership in this country. I think they don’t bode well forAmericas future. Plenty of Republican’s vote for bills that just make me sick. Like the NDAA section that allows the gov to kill or detain indefinitely anyone they declare as a terrorist.

    • Abu Basama October 12, 2012 at 9:30 AM - Reply

      Whats wrong with Kenya? Most of u r european rejects so whats wrong with an african reject? or is it because he is black that you dont like him? Idiot

      • Steve Snow October 12, 2012 at 11:52 AM - Reply

        Most of the problems in Africa are the result of English rule you know.

        • sara October 12, 2012 at 1:01 PM - Reply

          Ahh, a racist……

      • The Man October 12, 2012 at 12:06 PM - Reply

        don’t bring race into it Abu hole

      • Steve Cox October 12, 2012 at 2:51 PM - Reply

        NOthing is wrong with being from Kenya, but if you think and act like a liberal socialist then there is plenty wrong.

      • hottrika October 12, 2012 at 9:35 PM - Reply

        No, because he is a buffoon that is why we don’t like him. And no more coloring this with racist overture.

      • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:27 PM - Reply

        AH……the reliable “race card” appears as expected ! Some thing never change ! 🙁

    • River of Light October 12, 2012 at 12:47 PM - Reply

      You better check in with the fact checkers before you start talking about who is lying. People who fabricate their own view of the universe and only check in w/ their own point of view are rarely considered to be engaging in truth by the rest of the world.

      • Steve Cox October 12, 2012 at 2:48 PM - Reply

        You put a lot of faith in your fact checkers? I suggest some digging and reading on your own.

      • Senior8 October 14, 2012 at 8:24 PM - Reply

        I assume that statement is addressed to the sheeple that follow the Messiah regardless of the obvious ? !

  195. Will October 11, 2012 at 5:27 PM - Reply

    he also said the economy is better.

    • Ted Glass October 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM - Reply

      It is… we lost 800,000 jobs the month Obama took over, and millions in the months before that. Are we losing that many jobs now? NO. So it is better. Not hard to understand.

  196. Human value October 11, 2012 at 1:44 PM - Reply

    As a none american i find it disgusting that this European/American stand up as a rich American who don’t have to worry when he get sick say with Cancer or Aids,yeah i have alot of cash,oh by the way those 45% other American i don’t need o dear.All you black you can make a change for all those lost Nativ American, and the slave lost souls of African all these pains,waste lives for such a speech from Romney AMERICA GET REAL.

    • Nancy Law October 11, 2012 at 5:26 PM - Reply

      Human value or is it better put, Human debris?

      Spoken like a true wanna be Communist that doesn’t know Mitt from a hole in the ground. So how’s it like to live in a trash dumpster over in Europe? Could you be living in France where the wealthy are leaving in droves? You see OTHERS don’t want to subsidize you! Yes, you are repulsive and lazy. In America we despise people like YOU – so stay in your bankrupt Europe and be “happy”. I take it your “gay” too ….try be normal for a change and the risk of aids is reduced to nearly 0%.

    • GamecockMac October 11, 2012 at 6:26 PM - Reply

      Reading that garbled nonsense gave me a headache. Go back to school, and pay attention this time.

    • hottrika October 12, 2012 at 2:48 AM - Reply

      Bring back Obummer the Hussein so that the SHARIA could replace Democracy, Western Values could lay back so Death by Stoning could be the next legislation. Don’t take it as a doomsday prophesy, take it as a warning. He will be free to implement his IDEALS when he is under no pressure, that is unless he succeeds in changing the Constitution of America, the signs of which are not very visible only to the politically BLIND.

      • scmaize October 12, 2012 at 7:57 AM - Reply

        Yes, childish insults and hate make you a true American–not.

        • hottrika October 12, 2012 at 9:10 AM - Reply

          True American is EXTINT. What remains is a Obummer boot licker.

    • James October 12, 2012 at 6:21 AM - Reply

      Obama, Truly an African-American whose African relatives probably sold Black Americans ancestors into slavery. And who today butcher each other on the African Continent. I am a poor American and I do have Cancer and I have had Open Heart Valve repair and have had cateract eye surgery and I was taken care of because I didn’t have the means to take care of it myself. America has been very good to me even without Obama care. Because as a rich and prosperous nation it could afford to help me. But how is a economically devastated America going to care for the poor? You can have all kinds of great social programs but it takes money to make them work. If you don’t understand that I can’t help. You GET REAL! And Romney never said anything like what you are saying. It is really easy to win an Argument when you get to put words in your opponents mouth.

      • hottrika October 12, 2012 at 9:12 AM - Reply

        Very well articulated. Mitt haters are just ignorant fools believing everything the media dishes out to them as Gospel.

  197. ozob October 11, 2012 at 1:24 PM - Reply

    Written by the editor in chief of the daily witness a British rag tabloid. Not even good for wiping your arse with.

    • hottrika October 12, 2012 at 2:39 AM - Reply

      Why are you Americans so ashamed of the truth?

      • Abu Basama October 12, 2012 at 9:37 AM - Reply

        At last someone with a brain!!! Obvious ur not american

        • Steve Cox October 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM - Reply

          Don’t you get it Abu, hottrika was talking about people ashamed of the trith like you, the Liberal Obama lovers that can’t stand the truth.

        • Nadeen T-Flores October 28, 2012 at 8:32 PM - Reply

          As if u are American!!

      • Steve Cox October 12, 2012 at 3:02 PM - Reply

        I believe you will find most are not.

    • Steve Cox October 12, 2012 at 3:01 PM - Reply

      Has to be better than the many liberal rags out there. This author is exceptionally well informed

  198. muliye October 11, 2012 at 11:04 AM - Reply

    why do I get the feeling this article borders on WHITE SUPREMACY???? Hey maybe its just me!

    • Jay Stevens October 11, 2012 at 5:52 PM - Reply

      You are right. It IS just you.
      I do, however, predict that Obama’s next debate performance will be better. It would be difficult for him to do worse.

      • sara October 12, 2012 at 1:33 PM - Reply

        It has already been reported that Obama has become so jealous that he means to be the meanest he can be towards his Opponent Romney.and that means reallly MEAN. Watch out Mitt, Obama will be doing his Homework this time around…..

    • edwlh October 11, 2012 at 5:59 PM - Reply

      Yes, it is just you. Why do you libs make everything out to be about race? Romney did better than Nobama. He would also make a better president. Live with it.

      • YepSure October 11, 2012 at 11:33 PM - Reply

        It’s Obama, not Nobama. If you can’t even spell the guy’s name, your credibility is gonna take a hit.

        Sure, Obama lost the first debate badly, but Romney takes a new position every day and is either lying or misinformed on many key issues, including the feasibility of his own tax plan. Which is a more serious problem?

        • James October 12, 2012 at 6:25 AM - Reply

          Obama. That is the more serious problem. Glad I could help clear that up for ya.

        • Mr. Lee October 12, 2012 at 1:25 PM - Reply

          Wow! Yepsure, you aren’t very smart. edwith was saying Nobama on purpose……(tongue in cheek…Nobama means No Obama)

    • GamecockMac October 11, 2012 at 6:27 PM - Reply

      Yes, because anyone who dares to criticize a black man is automatically a racist.

    • Richard Mercado October 12, 2012 at 8:40 AM - Reply

      When you are backed into corner and caught with your pants down you use the race card. Nothing new it has been going on for decades.

Leave A Response »

beylikdüzü escort şirinevler escort avcılar escort
istanbul escort bayan istanbul escort testtürlü escort alanya escort antalya escort istanbul escort alanya escort
escort izmir erotik film izle hint filmleri gora 2 izle yeni nesil ajan 3 izle john wick 2 izle animasyon filmleri ölümcül deney 6 izle 2017 filmleri erotik filmler reis filmi izle recep ivedik 5 izle http://www.cilekfilm.com/ hızlı ve öfkeli 8 izle canlı maç izle bahis siteleri güvenilir bahis siteleri yeni bahis siteleri iddaa tahminleri
instagram beğeni hilesi porno izle fetis porno SEO şişli escort filmi full izle hd film izle beylikduzu escort kozbet canlı maç izle filmhizmeti.com film izle aksiyon filmleri macera filmleri 2017 filmleri tekfullhdfilmizle.com film izle yerli filmler bilim kurgu filmleri korku filmleri
canlı maç izle maltepe escort hd film izle izmir escort hardcoremobileporn pussygate fuckhardgirl maturejizzporn milfsuck mobileteenporn phonepornzilla pornteenxtube teenpornzillatube watchpornzillatube watchteenpornzillatube youteentube amateursexporntubex mobile3gpkingtube 3gpmobileporns mobilexnxxporn
türk porno